Skip to main content

Don't name your class "XXXManager"

How to you name your classes? How many classes you have in your current project named "Manager" and "Repository"? In the last period of time I saw a lot of classes named "Manager", so may that I begin to think that this is a suffix for any class that do some actions.
In this blog post I will talk about some suffixed that can be used when we need to name a class. First of all let why I don't like the "Manager" suffix? Because you cannot understand what the class do. Basically, "Manager" is so general that you can put almost anything there. When I read the name of the class I expect to understand what it does. For example a class with "Writer" suffix will tell me that this class is used to write data.
In the next part of the post I will enumerate some common suffix and when we can use them:
  • XXXFactory - Create objects
  • XXXWritter - Write data to a specific location
  • XXXReader - Read data from a specific location
  • XXXProtocol - Define a specific protocal
  • XXXConverter - A coverter that is used to convert from one type to another
  • XXXShepherd - Manage the lifetime of objects from creation to unload (delete)
  • XXXCoordinator - Coordinates a specific action or object
  • XXXBuilder - Is able to create new instances of objects
  • XXXContainer - A container of elements
  • XXXHandler - An handler for some a functionality
  • XXXController - Define a controller for an object
  • XXXEntity - Define an entity
  • XXXView - Define a view for a specific class.
  • XXXTarget
  • XXXSynchronizer
  • XXXBucket
  • XXXAttribute
  • XXXType
  • XXXEditor
  • XXXBase
  • XXXNode
  • XXXItem
  • XXXInfo
  • XXXHelper
  • XXXProvider
  • XXXException
  • XXXService (you can have the same problem as with Manager)
And so on...
There are so many ways how we suffix a class that we don't need to stuck only on one or two names. For example if you see "FooManager" will you be able to know that this class synchronize content with a remote server? If you name your class "FooSynchronizer" any programmer that will read the name of the class will know what it does.
In conclusion try don't stuck only one XXXManager and XXService. The "Clean Code" book is a good starting point.

Comments

  1. indeed: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontNameClassesObjectManagerHandlerOrData :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...