Skip to main content

Azure Well-Architected AI workload Assessment

 AI is everywhere, part of the IT solutions we build and run today. Having an AI service, a good model, and data is not enough. As for cloud, the real difference is how we build, manage and run the whole solution. Microsoft created the Azure Well-Architected Framework for AI Workloads exactly for this reason — to help teams design AI systems that are reliable, secure, and cost-efficient.

The assessment has six main categories that we cover in the next section. Based on the results, we can gain a good understanding of the current AI workload estate and a list of actions to improve how you run and manage your AI workloads.



Designing the AI Application

The first step in building your AI application is to consider how you will structure it. Using containers for tasks like data processing or model inference helps maintain consistency across the system. This approach makes it easier to update, move, and manage different components. When you have multiple steps in your workflow, such as preparing data, calling models, and performing post-processing, an orchestrator can be very beneficial. Additionally, incorporating an API gateway allows you to manage all model endpoints in one centralised location. The main advantage of this setup is straightforward: the system operates more smoothly, scales more effectively, and is less likely to encounter issues.


Choosing the Application Platform

Selecting the right platform is very important. In Azure, you can choose from services like Machine Learning, Kubernetes, or serverless APIs. These make life easier because you don't need to manage infrastructure every day. You can use transient compute when required, save money, and still have high performance. When the platform fits the workload, everything becomes more stable and predictable.


Designing Training and Grounding Data

AI without good data is like an engine without fuel. You need to ensure your data is clean, secure, and unbiased. The framework helps you think about quality, access control, and retraining. For generative AI, properly grounded data, with indexing and chunking, ensures the model's answers are accurate and relevant. It means the AI becomes more trustworthy, and users get better results.


Building the Data Platform

Your data platform is the heart of everything. Azure provides many tools for collecting, transforming, and monitoring data. Automating these tasks saves time and avoids mistakes. Also, you can plan for reliability and cost control from the start. This makes your system stable and cost-effective.


MLOps and GenAIOps

This part is about making AI work like a machine, not a manual process. Automation pipelines, model monitoring, and repeatable deployments are key. You can update and improve models faster, without breaking production. It's how innovation becomes part of daily work, not just an experiment.


Operations, Testing, and Responsible AI

Good operations mean visibility. Dashboards, alerts, and proper documentation help teams react faster when something goes wrong. Testing your models and data regularly builds confidence. And finally, Responsible AI reminds us to be fair, secure, and transparent and to define clear roles so everyone knows their responsibility.


Why should you use it?

When you design, build and run a solution using the Azure Well Architecture approach, you don't just integrate AI. You align your AI components with the rest of your IT and cloud ecosystem.

It is perfect for companies that are looking to move their AI from PoC to production, by providing a strong foundation aligned with vendors' directions and tools.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...