Skip to main content

Service Bus Queues from Windows Azure - Death letter and poison messages

I will continue the series of posts about Service Bus Queues. In this post we will talk about death letter. First of all, this concept is common to Service Bus and is not specific only to Service Bus Queues.
We should imagine death letter as an internal queue in our queue where all the messages that cannot be processes are added. This kind of messages is called death messages. For example what is happening in the following situation with the message that is abandoned:
BrokeredMessage message = qc.Receive();
try
{
if (messsage !=null)
{
    ...
    message.Complete();
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
    message.Abandon();
}
We will have a message that hangs on the queue and will be consumers over and over again without success. In this case we would need a method to mark the message as invalid. One solution is to invalidate the message and write this to a log. In this case even if the message is invalid we call the Complete() method. Be very careful when you call the Abandon() method. The message will be available in the queue again – it is very easy to create in this way messages that hang on the queue and cannot be processes.
Other option is to mark the message as “Differ”. In this case we will remain in the queue but we will be able to access it only by the message ID. This is not a valid case for our discussion.
Another solution is to mark the message as a poison message. A message marks as poison will be putted as a death letter.
message. DeadLetter()
or
message. DeadLetter(“…”,”…”)
In this way we mark the message as dead letter. The message is moved to death letter queue.
This sub-queue can be consumed by any other system or consumer and check the messages, log them and so on. The only thing that is not possible to do with it is to add the message to the original queue. To be an able to do this we will need to create a new BrokeredMessage with the same content. As a hint, the name of the sub-queue is [queueName]/$ DeadLetterQueue.
To be able to consume messages from this sub-queue we need to get the name of death letter queue. This can be very easy obtained using the FormatDeadLetterPath method of the QueueClient. After this step we obtained a normal QueueClient that can be used as we know it.
QueueClient deadletterQC = factory.CreateQueueClient(deadLetterQueuePath);
…
var message = deadletterQC.Receive();
…
We are not the only one that can put the messages in death letter queue. Windows Azure can mark a message from the queue as death when:
  • Message expired (TTL)
  • The maxim delivery count for a message is exceed
In this post we saw when is good to use death letter messages from Service Bus Queues. This type of messages can help us to decrease the complexity of our project. For example it is very simple to write a consumer that try for 3 times to process a message and if the action is without success to throw the message in the death letter queue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...