Skip to main content

Windows Azure Websites - Shared and Reserved mode

I think that we all of us already heard about Windows Azure Websites. This new feature of Windows Azure offers us the possibility to deploy websites very fast. Even for the first deploy, the deploy time can be very low.
What I would like to talk about today is the two different modes of Websites. The first one is Shared Website Mode. What does it means is that we don’t have a dedicated compute power. All the processor power is shared between our websites and other websites. From the performance perspective the performance will not be great. Is like hosting the websites to a classic hosting, that for 400$ per year host your application on IIS.
The other mode is the Reserved one. For this case we have dedicated resources that are allocated only to our application. We don’t share processor, memory or anything else. For this case we have 3 types of sizes (Small, Medium, Large) that we can set. Also we can specify the numbers of reserved instances from 1 to 3.
An interesting thing at Reserved mode is that even if we have dedicated resources we don’t have control to the machine. Our application is hosted on the IIS. This is why when we create a website on Windows Azure, the initializing time is very very low. For each reserved size, in this moment we have the following resources allocated: 1, 2, 4 cores and 1.75, 3.5, 7GB memory. The storage space is the same for all, 10GB.
Let’s wee when we could use Shared and Reserved mode. For the case when we create a demo application, or we have a blog or a site that is not very visited we can use Shared mode. When the traffic increases we should go with Reserved mode. A nice there will be a moment when we will not be able to use the website because our application need more resources and we will need to use a web role. The switch between them is not so simple if we didn’t use a web role until now. In the future I expect some tools that will make this migration automatically for users.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...