Skip to main content

Some scenarios when we can use Shared Access Signature from Windows Azure


In this post we will talk about some possible scenario when Shared Access Policy can be used. We will discuss about a different scenario for blobs, tables and queues.

Blobs

We are a graphical designer that creates templates for web applications. We decide that we what to offer this content to any persons based on a subscription that is paid for each template package. A template package can contain 100 web applications template for example.
How we can share this content very easily with our clients. A simple solution is using blobs and Shared Access Signature. For each client we create an access token that allow to access the templates for which he paid. Over this structure we create a web-application that allow user to download the templates packages after he insert his access token that is send via email.

Table

Let’s imagine an application that store on Azure table information about stock reports for the each weeks. This information is generated based on a lot of computation power. Because of this the company decides to share sell this valuable content based on a weekly subscriptions. A client can have access only to information for the weeks that he paid.
A solution could be to write a service that retrieves all this content based for a given password. To be able to do this we would need to register our client, authenticate them each time and so on.
A more simple solution is to put this content in Azure table and use Shared Access Signature to give read only access to our clients. Based on the unique token, the client will be able to access and query this information in any way they want. From our perspective, we can define for each table what partitions keys and rows keys a client can access. Each week, all we need to do is to update the Shared Access Signature for clients that paid the subscription for the next week. This can be done automatically without any problems.

Queues

We can imagine that we the biggest ice producer from our region and we create ice for other companies that sell it to general public (we create in 5 locations). We create a system that process each command based on the arrival. Our partners submit a request on our web site and based on their location and loading we are able allocate them to a specific ice fabric. Each ice fabric could have allocated a queue where from it could process the commands.
In the summer, the ice request is so big that we cannot delivery it. Because of this we decide to work with small ice factory that can help us. A solution to share all the commands for ice, but without sharing client and price information is to use Shared Access Policy over queues.
Each of our partners could get a limited access to the commands and queue and produce ice for us for a specific time. When we don’t need any more their help we can restrict the access to the commands queues.

There are a lot of scenarios that we could imagine. Don’t expect that Shared Access Signature to be the only solutions for our problems. But there will be times, when this is the simples solution, when we don’t need to implement something more and use an out of the box mechanism.

Tutorials about Shared Access Signature:
  1. Overview
  2. How to use Shared Access Signature with tables from Windows Azure
  3. How to use Shared Access Signature with blobs from Windows Azure
  4. How to use Shared Access Signature with queues from Windows Azure
  5. How to remove or edit a Shared Access Signature from Windows Azure 
  6. Some scenarios when we can use Shared Access Signature from Windows Azure

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...