Skip to main content

What is the behavior of an async method that returns void

In .NET 4.5 running async code was made easier than ever with async. I already talk a little about this new functionality, but I felt need to talk a little bit about some asycn methods that returns Task or (Task) and the async methods that returns void.
If we have an async method with the following definition:
public async Task<string> DoSomeActionAsync(…) { … }
In this case this method can be executed async and the method can be awaited. The user can wait until the action is executed. After the action is executed, the control is given back to code that waited the action to end. This action can start delegate asynchronous work.
In contrast with this definition, if we have the following definition:
public async void DoSomeActionAsync (…) { … }
This action cannot be awaited. When the user calls this method is a call of type fire and forget. The code that made the call will not be notified when the action was finished. Because of this, each call of this type start a separate independent flow.
Usually, an async method returns void when we want to define an event handler or to override void methods. Using this syntax it is very easy to call from event handler async methods.When you want to define a library that executes async calls or to define some helper methods you should always return Task or Task.
Also, when you work with async methods don’t forget to start them as soon as possible. I saw some async code, where the user defined some async methods and only at the end of an action he begins to execute these actions. If you have the possibility to start an async action sooner, than do it. In this you can reduce the execution time of your action. Because you can wait an async method multiple times, nothing will happen if you try to wait more than one time an action.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...