Skip to main content

Where clause

Mai mult ca sigur cu toții am folosit clauza where.
Pe scurt, where este folosit când trebuie sa adaugăm o constrângere la un tip generic specificat la o clasa sau la o metoda.
public class Car<TType>
where TType : ICarModel
{}
In exemplul de mai sus o sa putem folosii tipuri generice TType doar dacă implementează interfața ICarModel. In cazul in care vrem sa specificam ca tipul generic sa fie neaparat o clasa este nevoie sa ne folosim si de cuvantul rezervat class:
public class Car<TType>
where TType : ICarModel, class
{}
In cazul acesta, TType trebuie sa fie obligatoriu sa fie o clasa (nu va putea sa fie o structura de exemplu). Pentru structuri trebuie sa folosim cuvantul rezervat struct:
public class Car<TType>
where TType : struct
{}
Dar dacă vrem sa face new de un obiect de tip generic? In cazul aceasta trebuie sa specificam ca are un constructor default în clasau de where. Din păcate doar constructorul default fără parametri se poate specifica. In restul cazurilor o sa aveți nevoie de un factory sau de reflection pentru a crea noi instante din interiorul clasei Car.
public class Car<TType>
where TType : new()
{}
Gata cu introducerea, sa va zic ce vroiam de fapt. Cand avem 2 clause de where sintaxa este destul de ciudata, trebuie sa specificam de doua ori where.
public class Car<TType,TFormat>
where TType : new()
where TFormat : struct
{}
Mi se pare umpic mai ciudat ca cele doua where-uri nu sunt despartite prin virgula sau alt caracter (cuvînt rezervat).
Voua cum vi se pare sintaxa?

Comments

  1. Probabil ca sa simplifice un pic parser-ul: daca permiteau ceva de genul:
    where TType: IComparable, IEnumerable, TFormat : struct
    compiler-ul ar trebui sa se uite in avand ca sa isi dea seama ca TFormat nu e un tip de baza pentru TType, ci un tip generic..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dar dacă vreau sa specific încă o clasa de "where" nu mai este nevoie sa pun nici o virgula sau un alt caracter special. Mi s-a părut destul de interesant, pana ieri nici nu am observat lipsa acestui semn.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...