Skip to main content

Topic Isolation - (Part 6) Testing the limits of Windows Azure Service Bus

Some time ago I wrote about how I manage to process millions of messages over Windows Azure Service Bus. I discover that processing millions of messages every hour will increase the latency and response time of our topic.
I wanted to find out what I happening with the topics from the same account and data center when the load of one of them increase drastically. 
To be able to make this tests and discover the answer to my questions I made the following setup:
  • Create 3 topics on the same data center. Two on the same account and another one on a different account.
  • Create a worker role that will read messages from topics (via subscription) and monitor the delay time. The results will be written to Windows Azure Tables.
  • Create 8 worker roles that will push hundreds of thousands of messages in a very short period of time on the same topic (multi-threading rules).
  • Create 4 worker roles that will consume messages from our topic (via subscription).
In the end we end up with 12 worker roles that hit the same topic. Of course the latency of that topic increases, but we wanted to see if the rest of the topics are affected. I run this performance test for around 6 hours and …
The results of the test were extremely good. The second and 3rd topic where not affected by this load test. The latency remain the same for this 2 topics during the load test.
I’m very happy with this results. This is a confirmation that we will have a good performance on all of our topics. The topics are 100% isolated are not affected by the rest of out topics.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Fundamental Books of a Software Engineer (version 2018)

More then six years ago I wrote a blog post about fundamental books that any software engineer (developer) should read. Now it is an excellent time to update this list with new entries.

There are 5 different categories of books, that represent the recommended path. For example, you start with Coding books, after that, you read books about Programming, Design and so on.
There are some books about C++ that I recommend not because you shall know C++, only because the concepts that you can learn from it.

Coding

Writing solid codeCode completeProgramming Pearls, more programming pearls(recommended)[NEW] Introduction to Algorithms

Programming

Refactoring (M. Fowler)Pragmatic ProgrammerClean code[NEW] Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach[NEW] The Mythical Man-Month[NEW] The Art of Computer Programming

Design

Applying UML and Patterns (GRASP patterns)C++ coding standards (Sutter, Alexandrescu)The C++ programming language (Stroustrup, Part IV)Object-oriented programming (Peter Coad)P…

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…