Skip to main content

Coding Stories V - Serialization with XmlArrayItem

Serialization, almost all applications need this feature. Nowadays serialization can be in different formats. The trend now is to use JSON, but there are many applications that uses XML.
Let’s look over the following code:
public class Car
{
  public string Id { get; set; }
}
public class City
{
  [XmlArray("Cs")]
  [XmlArrayItem("C")]
  public List<Car> RegisterCars { get; set; }
}
...
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(City));
serializer.Serialize(writer, city);
Output:
<city>
  <Cs>
    <c>
      <id>1</id>
    <c>
    <c>
      <id>2</id>
    <c>
  <Cs>
</city>
Even if the code compiles, works perfectly, there is a small thing that can affect us. Because we use XmlArrayItem attribute, each node from the list will be named “C”. If we will need to deserialize only a C node then we will have a surprise.
This cannot be done with the default XmlSerializer class.
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(Car));
serializer.Deserialize("<c><id>1</id></c>");
This will expect a node named “Car”, that cannot be found there.
Because of this, when we need to control the name of the nodes from a list and I recommend to not use the XmlArrayItem. A better approach is with [XmlRoot(ElementName = "c")] on the Car class. Using this approach, we will be able to deserialize a child node of the list without having to deserialize all the list.
The final code will look like this:
[XmlRoot(ElementName = "c")]
public class Car
{
  public string Id { get; set; }
}
public class City
{
  [XmlArray("Cs")]
  public List<Car> RegisterCars { get; set; }
}
Even if this is a small thing, on a big project this can affect how different components deserialize the content. Deciding how items need to be serialized is an important step that needs to be done from the beginning.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...