Skip to main content

Certificates Hell - How you can kill all your clients

Certificates, a lot of times I saw applications in production were down because of them. From big companies to small companies, each one had a lot of problems because of certificates. I would name this problems – Certificates Hell. Each problem that appeared because of them was caused by people or by a wrong process.
In this post I will tell you a short story on how you can make over 10.000+ clients unhappy. In a web application or a client/server application you need to use secure connection and of course certificates. The application contains a backend that is pretty complicated and more web applications. Additionally to this, there are also some native applications on iPhone, iPad, Android and Windows Phone. 
They are in production for about 5 years. In this period of time the web application changed, they started to create different native applications for mobile devices. Each native application contains also some certificates used to authenticate users and establish secure connection. 
 Everything was great until they decided to update their root certificate used by native applications. Guess what happened? All their mobile applications were down, none of their clients could use the mobile application anymore. 
Because they’ve updated the servers’ certificates, all their clients that had “hardcoded” the client certificates were down. All the certificates made from that application were refused by servers.
The solution for their problem was to push a new update for mobile applications. Of course updating a mobile application requires 1, 2 days - to reach to the clients. In all this period of time they had a lot of complains.
What they’ve done wrong? Two things.
Hardcoding the client certificates into the mobile application and change the server certificates without taking into account all the dependencies.
They had to learn it in the hard-way, like other big companies. 

Comments

  1. Was that Microsoft? :-)

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/02/23/ridiculous-microsofts-azure-fails-over-unrenewed-security-certificate/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No. Was another big company. The name is not important.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

What to do when you hit the throughput limits of Azure Storage (Blobs)

In this post we will talk about how we can detect when we hit a throughput limit of Azure Storage and what we can do in that moment. Context If we take a look on Scalability Targets of Azure Storage ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/storage-scalability-targets/ ) we will observe that the limits are prety high. But, based on our business logic we can end up at this limits. If you create a system that is hitted by a high number of device, you can hit easily the total number of requests rate that can be done on a Storage Account. This limits on Azure is 20.000 IOPS (entities or messages per second) where (and this is very important) the size of the request is 1KB. Normally, if you make a load tests where 20.000 clients will hit different blobs storages from the same Azure Storage Account, this limits can be reached. How we can detect this problem? From client, we can detect that this limits was reached based on the HTTP error code that is returned by HTTP