Skip to main content

Why and Where for MongoDB, Cassandra, CouchDB, HBase, Membase, Redis

More and more people are starting to use NoSQL. I think this is extremely good. NoSQL can make our life better in a lot of situations. In this post I will try make a list of current NoSQL solutions that exist on the market and when we should use each other.

  • Dynamic query
  • Content is stored as documents
  • Big database that need to be very fast
  • Properties are stored like query and index
  • Can be used for voting system, CMS or comment storage

  • When you make a lot of updates and insert
  • Reading data is not the main scope of the database (writes are faster than reads)
  • Content is stored as column
  • High availability
  • Can be used with success for logging
  • Financial industry or any place where we work with a lot of data that is needed to be written
  • Basket of an e-commerce application

  • For data that don’t change very often (insert and read and NOT update)
  • We have a lot of predefined queries and we need versioning support
  • Is a great database for CMS and CRM.

  • When you do data analyzing
  • Works great in combination with Hadoop

  • When we need high concurrency
  • When the latency is very low and we want the latency to be minimal
  • Backend of a game or a system that offer data in real time

  • When we need to make a lot of updates
  • When the database is not too big and can be kept in memory
  • Can be used when we have a real time communication, for example a stock market with prices
If you know other NoSQL solutions or other strong points for this frameworks, please tell me.


  1. Nice...(1 word bez i want my comment also shorter and crisp like your post)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

GET call of REST API that contains '/'-slash character in the value of a parameter

Let’s assume that we have the following scenario: I have a public HTTP endpoint and I need to post some content using GET command. One of the parameters contains special characters like “\” and “/”. If the endpoint is an ApiController than you may have problems if you encode the parameter using the http encoder.
using (var httpClient = new HttpClient()) { httpClient.BaseAddress = baseUrl; Task<HttpResponseMessage> response = httpClient.GetAsync(string.Format("api/foo/{0}", "qwert/qwerqwer"))); response.Wait(); response.Result.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); } One possible solution would be to encode the query parameter using UrlTokenEncode method of HttpServerUtility class and GetBytes method ofUTF8. In this way you would get the array of bytes of the parameter and encode them as a url token.
The following code show to you how you could write the encode and decode methods.

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…