Skip to main content

Service Bus Topic - Automatic forward messages from a subscription to a topic

Windows Azure Service Bus Topic is a service that enables us to distribute the same messages to different consumers without having to know each consumer. The only think that we need to do is to know the topic name. Each consumer will need to create and connect to a different subscription. Each message added to topic will be forward to each subscription.
There are times when we need to forward a message from a subscription to another topic or queue. Until now we had to use a worker role that took the message from the subscription and adding it to the second topic.
From now, a subscription supports this great functionality, by default. We only need to set the name of the topic or queue of the Service Bus where we want to forward the message.
SubscriptionDescription description = new SubscriptionDescription("topic1","subscription1");
description.ForwardTo = "topic2";
SqlFilter filter = new SqlFilter("FW = true");
namespaceManager.CreateSubscription(description, filter);
In this setup, all the messages that have the property FW set to true will be send automatically from subscription1 to topic2.
MessagingFactory messageFactory =
MessageSender messageSender = messageFactory.CreateMessageSender("topic1");
BrokeredMessage message = new BrokeredMessage();
messageToSend.Properties.Add("FW", true);
Don’t forget that the message is not automatically forward to the next topic. Because of this, if you write a unit test you will need to wait 5-10 seconds before checking the second subscription.
SubscriptionClient messageReceiver =
     messageFactory.CreateSubscriptionClient("topic2", "subscription1");
BrokeredMessage message = messageReceiver.Receive(new TimeSpan(0, 0, 5));
We saw how easy is to forward a message from one subscription to another topic. We don’t need a consumer for a subscription or something similar. This is a great feature that permit us to define workflows using Service Bus Topic.


Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…