Skip to main content

[IoT Home Project] Part 5 - Send data to Azure IoT Hub, control time interval and refac the configuration information

In this post we will discover how we can:
  • Send all device sensor data that are read from GrovePI to Azure IoT Hub
  • Read sensor data at a specific time interval
  • Extract all configuration data in a separate file

Send all device sensor data that are read from GrovePI to Azure IoT Hub
This is a simple task. The function that reads sensor data from GrovePI already returns all the sensor data. The only thing that we need to do is to put this information in the message that is send to Azure IoT Hub.
In the future it is pretty clear that we will have different type of messages that we send over IoT Hub. Because of this we shall add a property to the message that is send to IoT Hub that specifies the message type - in our case we'll call the message that contains sensor data 'sensorData'.
var dataToSend = JSON.stringify({
    deviceId: "vunvulearaspberry",
    msgType: "sensorData",
    sensorInf: {
        temp: sensorsData.temp,
        humidity: sensorsData.humidity,
        distance: sensorsData.distance,
        light: sensorsData.light
    }
});
deviceCommunication.sendMessage(dataToSend);

Read sensor data at a specific time interval
In this moment we have a 'while(true)' that reads sensor information and send data to IoT Hub. This works great, but what if we want to control how often data is read.
To be able to do this, we can use 'setInterval' function from node.js. This function allows us to specify a time interval when a function is called. The time interval is specified in milliseconds. 
The nice thing is that the functions will not be executed in parallel if the first call didn't finished yet. This is important when we specify a small time interval like 100 ms and the read sensor information and send data operations takes more than 100 ms.
function collectSensorData(grovePiSensors, deviceCommunication) {
    var timeIntervalInMilisec = 5000;  // 5s
    setInterval((grovePiSensors, deviceCommunication) => {
        var sensorsData = grovePiSensors.getAllSensorsData();

        var dataToSend = JSON.stringify({
            deviceId: "vunvulearaspberry",
            msgType: "sensorData",
            sensorInf: {
                temp: sensorsData.temp,
                humidity: sensorsData.humidity,
                distance: sensorsData.distance,
                light: sensorsData.light
            }

        });
        deviceCommunication.sendMessage(dataToSend);
    }, timeIntervalInMilisec, grovePiSensors, deviceCommunication);
}

Extract all configuration data in a separate file
In this moment we have configuration data in multiple modules. If we want to change something, we need to search where the configuration is stored, some information like device id string is duplicated.
The code is not so nice and a change can be buggy and time consuming.
To avoid all this problems, we ca create a config.json file in our application where all configuration data is added. For each module I prefer to create a section where I group specific configuration for that that module ('deviceCommunicationConfig' and 'grovePiConfig').
{
    "debug" : true,
    "sensorDataTimeSampleInSec" : 5,
    "deviceCommunicationConfig":
    {
        "deviceId" : "vunvulearaspberry",
        "azureIoTHubMasterConnectionString" : "HostName=vunvulear-iot-hub.azure-devices.net;SharedAccessKeyName=iothubowner;SharedAccessKey=+whKMyd08PLDNoaR+yEmToJcHL6wsFo36tAyDBU8Qr0=",
        "azureIoTHubHostName" : "vunvulear-iot-hub.azure-devices.net"
    },
    "grovePiConfig":
    {
        "dhtDigitalSensorPin" : 2,
        "ultrasonicDigitalSensorPin" : 4,
        "lightAnalogSensorPin" : 2,
        "soundAnalogSensorPin" : 0
    }
}

Once we have all this configuration, we will need to access it. For this we can load the JSON in our application and access the properties of the configuration file.
var Config = require('./config.json');
...
var grovePiSensors = new GrovePiSensors(Config.grovePiConfig);
...
this.debug = debug;
this.registry = AzureIoTHub.Registry.fromConnectionString(Config.deviceCommunicationConfig.azureIoTHubMasterConnectionString);
this.deviceId = Config.deviceCommunicationConfig.deviceId;
this.azureIoTHubHostName = Config.deviceCommunicationConfig.azureIoTHubHostName;

In each module we don't need to specify all the configuration file. We can only specify the section that is specific to that module ('Config.deviceCommunicationConfig'). For this you can take a look in the source file.

Conclusion
Mission complete for now. See push all sensor data to Azure IoT Hub and we have the flexibility to change configuration more easily. Additional to this we have control on how often data is pushed to Azure IoT Hub.

Next Step
In the next post we will start to store the data that is pushed to Azure IoT Hub to blobs. On top of this we will take a look on how we can calculate the average values for read data.

Next post: [IoT Home Project] Part 6 - Stream Analytics and Power BI

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...