Skip to main content

The provided URI scheme 'file' is invalid; expected 'http'

Zilele acestea lucram pe un proiect Silverlight si m-am trezit intr-un anumit moment ne-am trezit cu urmatoarea eroare:
The provided URI scheme 'file' is invalid; expected 'http'
in momentul in care se genera URL serviciului consumat de catre aplicatie Silverlight. ChannelFactory nu stia ce sa faca cu un path non HTTP care nu era de forma HTTP, in conditiile in care acesta era configurat sa lucreze pe HTTP.
Dupa ce am sapat putin, am observat ca adresa care se adresa care se genera avea urmatoarea forma "/MyService/service1.svc", iar in momentul cand se incerca generarea unui endpoint se obtinea o adresa de forma "file://C:[somePath]/MyService/service1.svc".

var endpointAddress = new EndpointAddress("/MyService/service1.svc");
Problema aparea de la modul in care era rulata solutie. In loc sa se ruleze proiectul web, care continea solutie Silverlight, se rula de fapt proiect Silverlight, acesta ruland din locatia file://....
Odata schimbat proiectul care se rula din cel de SL in cel web problema s-a rezolvat.


Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…