Skip to main content

How to extract a file extension from a string path

Cautand ceva printr-o aplicatie am gasit urmatoarele linii de cod:
foreach (Foo foo in contaner.Foos)
if ( foo .FileName.EndsWith(".exe") )
// executa o actiune
Ce vi se pare ciudat in codul de mai sus?
Ce mi-a sarit mie in ochi in primul moment a fost modul in care se verifica daca extensia la fisier este ".exe". .NET ne pune la dispoztie clasa System.IO.Path, prin intermediul careia putem sa extragem numele de fisier, extensia, full path-ul, root path etc.
In cazul nostru putem sa folosim metoda Path.GetExtension(string). Aceasta metoda o sa ne returneze extensia fisierului, daca fisierul are extensie, iar in cazul in care fisierul nostru nu are extensie atunci o sa returneze stringul gol( String.Empty).
Dar ce se intampla in cazul in care path-ul pe care noi il dam este NULL? Valoarea care o sa fie returnata o sa fie la randul ei NULL.
Codul de mai sus l-am putea rescrie in felul urmator:
foreach (Foo foo in contaner.Foos)
if ( Path.GetExtension(foo .FileName) == ".exe" )
// executa o actiune
Nu trebuie sa uitam ca exista si metoda Path.HasExtension(string), care o sa returneze TRUE, daca path-ul dat contine o extensie. In cazul de mai sus nu e nevoie sa facem aceasta verificare, deoarece GetExtension o sa ne returneze mereu string-ul Empty daca fisierul nu contine nici o extensie.
Dar trebuie sa avem grija sub ce forma este extensia. Daca pentru noi "exe" este egal cu "eXe" si cu "EXE", atunci verificarea de egalitate trebuie sa fie facuta folosind metoda Equals. Codul nostru ar trebuie sa fie rescris in felul urmator:
foreach (Foo foo in contaner.Foos)
if ( Path.GetExtension(foo .FileName).Equals(".exe", StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase )
// executa o actiune
As vrea sa atrag atentia ca metoda Path.GetExtension(string) ne returneaza extensia unui fisier inclusiv cu ".". De exemplu pentru "foo.exe", valoarea returnata o sa fie ".exe".


  1. Daca nu vrei sa afli care e extensia (fara sa o stii in prealabil), ci doar vrei sa verifici ca extensia e sau nu un anume string (".exe" in cazul asta), prima varianta mi se pare ok
    (si poate si o idee mai eficienta daca se foloseste OrdinalIgnoreCase, nu InvariantCultureIgnoreCase).

    Singura lipsa ar fi faptul ca e case si culture-sensitive, dar EndsWith are si un overload care accepta un StringComparation.

    Normal, prima varianta e ok doar daca presupunem ca definitia a ce inseamna 'extension' ramane aceeasi in viitor.. :)

  2. .ToLower poate sa fie si aceasta o solutie. Personal prefer sa folosesc Equal in loc de ToLower si ==. Mi se pare mult mai clar si nu e nevoie sa apelez ToLower pentru ambele string-uri pe care le compar( daca nu sunt constante). Dar depinde de caz si de preferintele fiecaruia.

    Pentru a extrage extensia unui fisier nu as evita EndsWith. Daca intr-un API a unui framework avem deja un mecanism pentru o anumite functionalitate deja implementat, prefer sa o folosesc pe aceasta( teoretic ar trebuii sa fie mai sigura si sa nu genereze erori).
    In acest caz mi se pare mult mai lizibil codul folosind GetExtension. Cel care citeste isi da seama mai usor ce se intampla acolo.

  3. Pai asta ziceam, ca in cazul de mai sus nu e nevoie sa extragi extensia unui file name (pentru ca stii deja care ar trebui sa fie extensia).. :)
    Intr-adevar, cu GetExtension codul e ceva mai usor de inteles - o alta varianta, ca sa fie clara intentia ar fi:
    string expectedExtension = ".exe";
    if ( foo.FileName.EndsWith(expectedExtension, ...) ) ...

  4. Hai ca facem semantica cu totii...


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

Fundamental Books of a Software Engineer (version 2018)

More then six years ago I wrote a blog post about fundamental books that any software engineer (developer) should read. Now it is an excellent time to update this list with new entries.

There are 5 different categories of books, that represent the recommended path. For example, you start with Coding books, after that, you read books about Programming, Design and so on.
There are some books about C++ that I recommend not because you shall know C++, only because the concepts that you can learn from it.


Writing solid codeCode completeProgramming Pearls, more programming pearls(recommended)[NEW] Introduction to Algorithms


Refactoring (M. Fowler)Pragmatic ProgrammerClean code[NEW] Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach[NEW] The Mythical Man-Month[NEW] The Art of Computer Programming


Applying UML and Patterns (GRASP patterns)C++ coding standards (Sutter, Alexandrescu)The C++ programming language (Stroustrup, Part IV)Object-oriented programming (Peter Coad)P…