Skip to main content

Short brief - Request-Response, Asynchron and Fire and Forget patterns

Un apel spre un serviciu poate sa fie facut in diferite moduri. Cele mai uzuale moduri sunt cele care respecta paternul Request-Response si Asynchron. Pe langa aceste doua paternuri mai exista inca unul, dar care este mai rar folosit Fire and Forget.
Request-Response pattern- se refera la faptul ca pentru fiecare request facut se asteapta raspunsul.
Response response = service.CallService(request)
Asynchron pattern - este un patern bazat pe evenimente. Odata ce un apel a fost facut, aplicatia nu asteapta raspunsul de la server. Cel care face apelul trebuie sa se inregistreze la un eveniment care o sa fie declansat cand raspunsul soseste.
service.ResponseEvent += new EventHandler(ResponseReceived);
service.CallServiceAsync(request);
Fire and Forget pattern - este destul de asemanator cu paternul Asynchron, doar ca odata comanda trimisa nu ne mai intereseaza ce se intampla cu aceasta.
service.CalService(request);    // Metoda nu returneaza nimica
Exista diferite scenarii cand Fire and Forget este recomandat sa fie folosit. Conditia principala care trebuie sa fie implinita ca sa putem folostii acest patern este ca sa ne putem asigura ca request-ul ajunge la server - avem un protocol ce ne garanteaza ca mesajele au ajuns la destinatie( de exemplu daca folosim cozi de mesaje care ne asigura ca mesajele nu se pierd - de exemplul MQ).
In cazul in care avem servicii cu un volum mare de request-uri, atunci poate pentru unele tipuri de request-uri putem sa folosim acest patern. De exemplu pentru cele in care rezultatul este format din mesaje precum Okay.
Cele mai mari dezavantaje apar in momentul in care ceva nu functioneaza bine. Debug-ul este destul de complicat si de obicei necesita interventia umana pentru a putea gasi problema. Problemele care pot sa apara sunt la nivelului protocolului care ar trebui sa ne garanteze ca mesajele ajung la destinatie.
Un alt mod de a apela un serviciu este de a face unu sau mai multe request-uri de tipul Fire and Forget, iar apoi la un moment dat sa se verifice daca a venit un raspuns( intr-un cache, in baza de date etc) - in cazul in care raspunsul se pune intr-o locatie unde atat clientul cat si serverul le pot accesa
Nu trebuie confundat un apel de forma:
service.CallService(request,()=>{ ... });
ca si cum ar fi un apel de tip Fire and Forget. Orice metoda sau lambda expresion specificata ca si al doilea parametru care este apelata in momentul in care raspunsul soseste de la server reprezinta un apel de tip asincron.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…

GET call of REST API that contains '/'-slash character in the value of a parameter

Let’s assume that we have the following scenario: I have a public HTTP endpoint and I need to post some content using GET command. One of the parameters contains special characters like “\” and “/”. If the endpoint is an ApiController than you may have problems if you encode the parameter using the http encoder.
using (var httpClient = new HttpClient()) { httpClient.BaseAddress = baseUrl; Task<HttpResponseMessage> response = httpClient.GetAsync(string.Format("api/foo/{0}", "qwert/qwerqwer"))); response.Wait(); response.Result.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); } One possible solution would be to encode the query parameter using UrlTokenEncode method of HttpServerUtility class and GetBytes method ofUTF8. In this way you would get the array of bytes of the parameter and encode them as a url token.
The following code show to you how you could write the encode and decode methods.
publ…