Skip to main content

Metoda marcata cu abstract si override

O metoda sau o propietate poate sa fie marcata ca abstracta cand aceasta nu contine si implementarea.
O metoda sau o propietate poate sa fie marcata ca override cand vrem sa modificam implementarea si sa oferim o noua implementare pentru un menbru mostenit din clasa de baza.
Pana aici nimic deosebit, OOP pur. Oare putem sa avem o metoda care sa fie marcata atat abstracta cat si override? Raspunsul este DA. Desi pare ciudat, putem sa marcam o metoda cu aceste doua atribute:
public void abstract override DoWork();
Cand putem sa avem acest caz?
Cand avem o clasa abstracta care contine o metoda virtuala.
public abstract Actiune
public virtual void DoWork()
Aceasta clasa poate sa fie mostenita de o alta clasa care sa ofere o alta implementare de baza la metoda DoWork.
public abstract Actiune2 : Actiune
public abstract override void DoWork();
Orice clasa ce va implementa clasa abstracta Actiune2 o sa fie obligata sa ofere o implementare la metoda DoWork(), chiar daca Actiune2 mosteneste din clasa abstracta Actiune1 care ofera o implementare pentru metoda noastra.


  1. Aha - si la properties pot exista astfel de cazuri, desi arata ciudat:


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

GET call of REST API that contains '/'-slash character in the value of a parameter

Let’s assume that we have the following scenario: I have a public HTTP endpoint and I need to post some content using GET command. One of the parameters contains special characters like “\” and “/”. If the endpoint is an ApiController than you may have problems if you encode the parameter using the http encoder.
using (var httpClient = new HttpClient()) { httpClient.BaseAddress = baseUrl; Task<HttpResponseMessage> response = httpClient.GetAsync(string.Format("api/foo/{0}", "qwert/qwerqwer"))); response.Wait(); response.Result.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); } One possible solution would be to encode the query parameter using UrlTokenEncode method of HttpServerUtility class and GetBytes method ofUTF8. In this way you would get the array of bytes of the parameter and encode them as a url token.
The following code show to you how you could write the encode and decode methods.

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…