Skip to main content

AutoMapper - object to object mapper

Acest mic framework ne ajuta cand trebuie sa mapam doua entita cu aceleasi propietati. In mod traditional pentru a face acest lucru trebuie sa scriem ceva de genul:
CarDb carDb = LoadFromDb(id);
// ...
Car car = new Car()
Type = carDb.Type,
Number = carDb.Number,
Owner = varDb.Owner,
RegFrom = carDb.RegFrom
Acest caz apare mai ales cand avem o aplicatie pe mai multe nivele, iar modelul care persista in baza de baza de date si modelul care ajunge la client sunt diferite.
Ce poate sa faca AutoMapper, este sa faca automat copierea valorilor proprietarilor, fara sa mai scrim noi cod. In cazul in care propietatea primeste o alta valorea sau are un nume diferit, putem sa scriem o expresie lambda care sa faca conversia.
Mai jos o sa gasiti cateva exenple:
1. Mapare intre doua entitati Car si CarDb
// Creare mapare.
Mapper.CreateMap<CarDb,Car>() ;
// Conversia propriu-zisa.
Car car = Mapper.Map<CarDb,Car>(carDb) ;
In loc sa avem o lista de propietati la care sa facem atribuiire, a fost nevoie sa apelam doar metoda CreateMap.
2. Maparea a doua propietati de tipuri diferite.
Sa presupunem ca Car contine o propietate IsHit de tip bool, iar CarDb contine aceiasi propietate, dar este de tipul int.
Pentru acest lucru este nevoie sa cream un nou ValueResolver care sa stie sa converteasc─â din int in bool. ValueResolver este un tip de data definit de AutoMapper, folosit pentru a face conversii intre date.
public class HitIntToBoolResolver : ValueResolver<int,bool>
protected ovveride bool ResolveCore(int val)
return val==1;
Iar pentru a face maparea trebuie pe CreateMap sa adaug─âm resolver-ul custom:
car => car.IsHit,
x => x.ResolveUsing<HitIntToBoolResolver>().FromMember( m => m.IsHit));
In acest moment, pentru propietatea IsHit, se va face o conversie automata din int in bool.
3. Cum sa atribuim o valoare custom la o propietate.
Sa presunem ca entitatea Car are o propietate FullNumber de tip string formata din RegDate+Number. Pentru a putea seta aceasta valoare in AutoMapper este nevoie sa scriem urmatorul cod:
car => car.FullNumber,
x => x.MapFrom( e => e.RegDate.ToString() + e.Number ));
In acest fel putem genera valori custom orice propietati.
4. In cazul in care entitatea are propietati care la randul lor trebuie mapate, ajunge sa definim maparea tuturor tipurilor de date implicate, in ncazul nostru este nevoie sa definim o mapare in plus pentru tipul de data Builder( presupunem ca entitatea Car are o propietare cu numele BuildBy de tip Buildder.
AutoMapper va detecta automat ca aceasta propietate este deja mapata si va folostii maparea definita deja.
Mapper .CreateMap<CarDb,Car>();
Car car = Mapper.Map<CarDb,Car>(carDb) ;

Din punct de vedere a vitezei, nu va asteptati sa fie la fel de rapid. In spate AutoMapper se bazeaza pe Reflection. Fata de o mapare manuala este undeva de 6-7 ori mai lent. In cazul in care nu aveti nevoie de mii de conversii pe secunta, cred ca AutoMapper este o solutie foarte buna. Obtinem un cod mai usor de intretinut si mult mai clar.


Popular posts from this blog

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

GET call of REST API that contains '/'-slash character in the value of a parameter

Let’s assume that we have the following scenario: I have a public HTTP endpoint and I need to post some content using GET command. One of the parameters contains special characters like “\” and “/”. If the endpoint is an ApiController than you may have problems if you encode the parameter using the http encoder.
using (var httpClient = new HttpClient()) { httpClient.BaseAddress = baseUrl; Task<HttpResponseMessage> response = httpClient.GetAsync(string.Format("api/foo/{0}", "qwert/qwerqwer"))); response.Wait(); response.Result.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); } One possible solution would be to encode the query parameter using UrlTokenEncode method of HttpServerUtility class and GetBytes method ofUTF8. In this way you would get the array of bytes of the parameter and encode them as a url token.
The following code show to you how you could write the encode and decode methods.

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…