Skip to main content

Custom configuration files for each developer machine

I think that all of you use configuration files. When we are working with a complex project, where many developers need to configure their environment in a way to have a custom configuration, there are cases when they install some application in different locations for example, or they have the SQL server with a different name.
What we can do with these cases? In a perfect world we would not have this problem, but for example a part of the team want to use the SQL Azure and another part of the team want to use their own SQL server instance.
When the configuration is in the web.config or in the app.config, Microsoft offer to us a very nice solution. We can have different configuration for each developer (on their local machine). Each time we will rebuild the solution, the configuration file will be regenerated.
This feature is supported from Visual Studio 2008 2010, but is not well known by all developers. In the next part of the post we will see how we can configure our project to support this functionality.
  • First step that need to be done is to remove the web.config file from TFS. This simple trick can be done if you follow the next steps:
  • Select your project, right-click on it and unload it (“Unload Project”)
  • Select your unloaded project, right-click on it and open with the XML editor (“Edit [ProjectName]”)
  • Search all the node named “Content” where the “Include” attribute point to the configuration files
  • Comment all the “DependentUpon” nodes that are under these nodes
  • Save the file and reload the project (right-click on the project and click on “Reload Project”)
<Content Include="Web.Debug.config">
  <!--<DependentUpon>Web.config</DependentUpon>-->
</Content>
<Content Include="Web.Release.config">
  <!--<DependentUpon>Web.config</DependentUpon>-->
</Content>
  • Duplicate the configuration file and rename the copy to “Web.base.config”
  • Remove the web.config file from TFS
In this moment we excluded the configuration file from TFS. Also we create a base configuration file that will be used by the system as the original configuration file.
After this step you can reopen the project with the XML editor and uncomment the “DependentUpon” nodes.
Now, we need to specify to the build to recreate the configuration file at each build using the base configuration file and the custom configuration files that can be found in the project. Next steps need to be done to be able to define this functionality:
  • Add a file to your project named[YourProjectName].wpp.targets
  • Add the following content to it:
Visual Studio 2010:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
    <UsingTask TaskName="TransformXml"
               AssemblyFile="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v10.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll"/>  
    <Target Name="CopyWebConfig" BeforeTargets="Build;Rebuild">
        <Copy SourceFiles="Web.base.config"
              DestinationFiles="Web.config"
              OverwriteReadOnlyFiles="true"
              SkipUnchangedFiles="false" />
    </Target>
    <Target Name="CustomTarget" BeforeTargets="BeforeBuild">
        <Message Text="Transforming: Web.$(Configuration).config" Importance="high" />
        <TransformXml Source="Web.base.config"
                      Transform="Web.$(Configuration).config"
                      Destination="Web.config" />
    </Target>
</Project>
Visual Studio 2012:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
    <UsingTask TaskName="TransformXml"
               AssemblyFile="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll"/>  
    <Target Name="CopyWebConfig" BeforeTargets="Build;Rebuild">
        <Copy SourceFiles="Web.base.config"
              DestinationFiles="Web.config"
              OverwriteReadOnlyFiles="true"
              SkipUnchangedFiles="false" />
    </Target>
    <Target Name="CustomTarget" BeforeTargets="BeforeBuild">
        <Message Text="Transforming: Web.$(Configuration).config" Importance="high" />
        <TransformXml Source="Web.base.config"
                      Transform="Web.$(Configuration).config"
                      Destination="Web.config" />
    </Target>
</Project>

This file is necessary in the build process to create the configuration file based on the base file and our custom configuration file that we will add.
Because each build configuration is custom for each machine, we can add many build configurations we want. For each build configuration we can add a custom configuration file. Let’s see how we can add a build configuration and to generate a configuration file for our custom build:
  • Go to “Build” menu from Visual Studio and select “Configuration Manager”
  • On the “Active solution configuration” combo-box select “New” and create a new build configuration with any name you want. I recommend a name like [username.machinename]
  • Close the “Configuration Manager” windows
  • Right-click on the configuration file from your project and click on “Add Config Transform”
  • Success, the system created our custom configuration file.  Don’t forget to NOT check-in this configuration file to the TFS. Also the “Add Config Transform” will be active only when there are some new changes in the “Configuration Manager”.
From now on when we will run our application using our custom configuration for the build, the configuration file will be recreated using the base configuration and our custom configuration file, specified for our custom build.
In this way we can have custom configuration on each developer machine without any kind of problemes.

Comments

  1. Nice :)
    Using this solution, is it possible for a developer to have separate solution configurations for Debug/Release/etc.. ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can have any kind of configuration. Your current build will not be named Debug for examle. Will be named MyCustomBuild. This happens because you need to create a new "Configuration Manager" for your build.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...