Skip to main content

Patterns in Windows Azure Service Bus - Scatter-Gather Pattern

I will continue the series of posts related to patterns that can be used using Service Bus from Windows Azure. In the last post from this blog series I talked about Content-Based Router Pattern and we saw how easily can be implemented using Service Bus Topics.
Today we will look over another message pattern. I don’t know if you ever heard about Scatter-Gather message pattern. It is not a widely used pattern. Also there are a lot of cased when we use this pattern without realizing.
The first step is to try to define this pattern. As you can see, this pattern is formed from two different words – scatter and gather.
  • Scatter – refers how we can send a message to a list of receivers (consumers)
  • Gather – refers how we receive a collection of messages from more than one source
Before talking more about this pattern let’s see an example where this pattern can be used with success. Very easily we can imagine that we are a company that wants to by surfaces (Windows 8 Tables) for all your employ. To get the best price on the market you want to have a price offer from all your suppliers. To be able to do something like this you will need to send a message with the price request for each supplier. After this you will need to gather all the offers and process them.
I thing that you already notified the “scatter” and “gather” in our example:
Scatter - sending the message to our suppliers
Gather – gather the prices from all the suppliers
As you can see, this pattern doesn’t represent only a small picture, but it a little more complicated. From some perspective we could say that this pattern is a combination of two different patterns – splitter and aggregator patterns.
Windows Azure Service Bus supports this pattern without any kind of problems. The Scatter-Gather pattern can be implemented with success using Service Bus Topic.
From the Scatter perspective we will each of our supplier to register to our topic. Each subscriber will receive our message with our request and we will be able to send to us their offer.
Creating the TopicClient:
TopicClient topicClient = TopicClient.CreateFromConnectionString(
CloudConfigurationManager.GetSetting(
    "ServiceBusConnectionString"),
    "myFooTopic");
Create a subscription for each supplier:
NamespaceManager namespaceManager = NamespaceManager                             
                 .CreateFromConnectionString(“ServiceBusConnectionString”);
namespaceManager.CreateSubscription( “myFooTopic”, “subscriptionNameForSupplier1”);
>Each supplier needs to listen the subscription (this action don’t need to be done 24/24h) – Windows Azure will preserve the messages until the subscriber will consume them.
SubscriptionClient subscriptionClient = SubscriptionClient.CreateFromConnectionString(
    CloudConfigurationManager.GetSetting("ServiceBusConnectionString"),
    "myFooTopic",
    "Property1Equal10");
BrokeredMessage message = subscriptionClient.Receive();
Sending the message to our subscribers:
BrokeredMessage message = new BrokeredMessage();
…
topicClient.Send(message);
Create a queue where each supplier can send the price offer and listen the given queue by our company:
NamespaceManager nm = NamespaceManager.CreateFromConnectionString(
     CloudConfigurationManager.GetSetting(“ServiceBusConnectionString”));
if (!namespaceManager.QueueExists("FooQueue"))
{
    namespaceManager.CreateQueue(qd);
}
QueueClient queueClient = QueueClient.CreateFromConnectionString(
    myFooConnectionString,
    "FooQueue");
BrokeredMessage offerReceived = queueClient.Receive();

When we create the infrastructure used to receive the offers from each supplier, we can use Service Bus Topics or Service Bus Queues without any kind of problems. For this case I think that Service Bus Queues is better, because we don’t need to distribute the messages to more than one receiver.
Last edit: A list of all patterns that can be used with Windows Azure Service Bus, that were described by me LINK.  

Comments

  1. Hi Radu, very great post! I'm interested in seeing in more detail how you might incorporate the aggregator pattern. In many of the examples of the pattern that I've seen, the aggregator uses a canonical schema and a message envelope to aggregate responses. Furthermore, what would you use for correlation to the original message?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Chris. Next week I will prepare a post that will response to your questions.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...