Skip to main content

Day 3 of Software Architecture 2012 & Basic Principles of an Object

Day 3 of Software Architect 2012 from London has passed. Today was a great day for science also. I went at 3 sessions sustained by Allen Holub. This man is not only a great speaker, but also knows the programing art extremely good.
Like in the other post about conferences where I participate, I will present in some words the things that I consider important.
Now we are living in a world that where OOP is everywhere. We are trying to create a model for each object from this world, but there are times when we forget base things. An object should expose a set of functionalities and not information. Sounds odd in our days, where everything is a POCO or a service, but this is how we should write our classes.
A world that is formed from POCO and services is not more than a procedural programing. In this case let’s change the name from OO to Procedural Programing. An object should be defined by what can do, what actions contain – public methods; and not by data that he contains. The content is not important; the functions that are exposed are the most important.
This is easy to say, but trust me, it is very hard to implement. For example when we have a class that want to calculate the price with VAD and deduction of a product we create a separate class for this. This calculator class will access the price property of our product. But we don’t need something like this. It is not wrong to have a method that returns the final price of the product in our product class. Yes, of course, as input parameter or in constructor we can specify an instance of an object that knows how to calculate (the final formula).
 There are lot more thing to talk about this subject. I promise that every week I will have a dedicated post related to OOP and design. Until than I will buy this book and start reading.


Popular posts from this blog

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

GET call of REST API that contains '/'-slash character in the value of a parameter

Let’s assume that we have the following scenario: I have a public HTTP endpoint and I need to post some content using GET command. One of the parameters contains special characters like “\” and “/”. If the endpoint is an ApiController than you may have problems if you encode the parameter using the http encoder.
using (var httpClient = new HttpClient()) { httpClient.BaseAddress = baseUrl; Task<HttpResponseMessage> response = httpClient.GetAsync(string.Format("api/foo/{0}", "qwert/qwerqwer"))); response.Wait(); response.Result.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); } One possible solution would be to encode the query parameter using UrlTokenEncode method of HttpServerUtility class and GetBytes method ofUTF8. In this way you would get the array of bytes of the parameter and encode them as a url token.
The following code show to you how you could write the encode and decode methods.

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…