Skip to main content

Why Microsoft is bringing Copilot together

 I don’t think Microsoft is bringing Copilot together just to make its product catalogue easier to understand.

The new Home, Code and Autopilot capabilities connect everyday work, building solutions and persistent agents, with a staged rollout. But this is not one unlimited licence for everything. GitHub Copilot, for example, still has separate plans.

Think about preparing a customer proposal. You need documents, customer information, a cost model and perhaps a small automation. You want to finish the proposal, not decide which Copilot should handle each step.

For me, this explains part of the change. The more interesting part is why Microsoft wants to do it now.

If another AI assistant becomes the place where we start our work, Microsoft’s applications could become tools running in the background. Microsoft would still provide the software, but another platform would have the direct relationship with the user. I see this move as a way to protect that relationship.

There is a technical connection too. Code uses the same underlying technology as GitHub Copilot. To me, this is a sign that capabilities developed for software engineering are becoming useful for broader business tasks.

Then there is the money. Microsoft combines fixed subscriptions with usage-based billing. This creates room for revenue to grow with agent activity, even without more employee licences. For customers, it means that a simpler experience will not necessarily mean a simpler bill.

What comes next? My guess is fewer decisions about which tool to open, and more connections between business processes and software development. I don’t expect specialised tools to disappear. I expect users to notice the boundaries less.

The part I would watch closely is the cost of getting a task completed correctly, including retries and human review.

Before scaling, I would start with one process and check who approves the result, what happens when the agent gets it wrong, and whether it actually saves effort.

Microsoft is making a case for doing more work inside Copilot. We still need to decide which work belongs there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Why Database Modernization Matters for AI

  When companies transition to the cloud, they typically begin with applications and virtual machines, which is often the easier part of the process. The actual complexity arises later when databases are moved. To save time and effort, cloud adoption is more of a cloud migration in an IaaS manner, fulfilling current, but not future needs. Even organisations that are already in the cloud find that their databases, although “migrated,” are not genuinely modernised. This disparity becomes particularly evident when they begin to explore AI technologies. Understanding Modernisation Beyond Migration Database modernisation is distinct from merely relocating an outdated database to Azure. It's about making your data layer ready for future needs, like automation, real-time analytics, and AI capabilities. AI needs high throughput, which can be achieved using native DB cloud capabilities. When your database runs in a traditional setup (even hosted in the cloud), in that case, you will enc...

Azure Service Bus - How to extend the lock of a message | RenewLock

In this post we will discuss about Azure Service Bus Topics and Queues, with a special focus on Peek and Lock feature. Introduction Azure Service Bus is a messaging system that allows us to send messages between different systems in a reliable and easy way. A lot of concepts from ESB are implemented by Service Bus, allowing us to do do magic stuff with messages. There are two ways to consume messages from Service Bus Peek and Lock - locks a message for a specific time internal and notify Service Bus when we want to mark the message as processed (removed from Service Bus) Receive and Delete  - once a message is received from Service Bus, it is also deleted automatically from the messaging system Peek and Lock When using Peek and Lock, by default we lock the message for 60 seconds. This means that in this time interval the message is not available/visible for other consumers. Once we process the message we can mark it as processed. If we don't mark the message as processe...