Skip to main content

Large-scale parallel computing - Checklist

 Managing large-scale parallel workloads presents unique challenges beyond simply adding more machines. Success requires clear decision-making, effective automation, and early testing of complex components. The following flow outlines each step and its importance.

Start with the numbers

Before anything else, agree on the measurable goals: how many vCPUs, what budget, how fast jobs must start and finish, and how tolerant you are to failures. These numbers keep conversations practical. If you can’t measure it, it’s hard to improve it.

What to do, and Why

1. Define goals & NFRs
Document concurrency targets, scheduling latency, SLOs, and team budgets. Clear, specific goals ensure alignment across all stakeholders.
2. Split control plane and executors
Treat the control plane as the system’s core for APIs, policy, and billing, while executors handle compute and data tasks. Isolate cloud-specific logic with adapters to simplify future cloud integrations.
3. Design the data plan
Store inputs and outputs in object storage. Use signed URLs, multipart uploads, and regional caches for frequently accessed files. Avoid relying on a single POSIX filesystem unless its limitations are well understood.
4. Pick the scheduler approach
Begin with a managed batch solution for quick deployment. For low-latency placement or specialized hardware, consider a custom or two-level scheduler.
5. Event model & telemetry
Configure workers to send status updates and assign a trace ID to each job. Maintain straightforward alerts, as excessive notifications are often disregarded.
6. Spot strategy
Design tasks to be small or checkpointable. Use spot instances to reduce costs, but reserve guaranteed capacity for critical jobs to meet SLAs.
7. Cost metering & governance
Implement early tagging and track job-level costs within the platform. Establish quotas and automated alerts to keep financial stakeholders informed.
8. Proof-of-concept (PoC)
Prioritize testing the most challenging aspects, such as data throughput and scheduling latency. If these fail, other improvements will not compensate. Keep the proof-of-concept focused and rigorous.
9. CI/CD and safe releases
Use canary deployments, automatic rollbacks, and frequent, incremental changes. Large-scale releases carry significant risk.
10. Runbooks and automation
Develop concise runbooks and automate routine tasks. Reserve human intervention for complex issues.
11. GenAI for ops
Leverage AI to recommend resource placement, draft runbooks, or provide cost estimates, but ensure all outputs are reviewed by humans and maintain an audit trail.
This framework is a guide, not a strict checklist. Engage operations and finance teams early to identify risks at various scales. Focus your proof-of-concept on the most critical risks, then iterate.

Quick checklist

  • Clear separation: control plane and executors
  • Event-driven worker updates and trace IDs
  • Signed URLs, multipart transfers, and caches for IO
  • Two-level scheduler or a proven autonomous scheduler
  • Restartable tasks and spot mix with some guaranteed capacity
  • Job-level cost tracking, quotas, and alerts
  • Canary CI/CD and automated rollback
  • Automated runbooks and simple anomaly alerts
  • PoC validating data throughput and scheduling latency
Final thought
Begin with a small scope and prioritize testing the most challenging components. Once data movement and scheduling are addressed, further progress becomes more manageable. Involve the team, apply straightforward automation, and iterate to build a reliable, large-scale platform.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...