In Phase 1, we reshape applications so they can scale, change, and integrate intelligence. But even with a perfect cloud-native architecture, GenAI will still fail if the data foundation is weak. This is why Phase 2 is always about data modernisation. In simple words: GenAI is only as good as the data you feed it, and most organisations today still feed it ‘yesterday’.
Many companies have data, but it is fragmented. Some sits in SQL databases, some in file shares, some in SharePoint, some in CRM, and much knowledge is hidden in PDFs, tickets, and Teams messages. When you build GenAI on top of this chaos, the result is inconsistent answers and low trust. And then people say, ‘GenAI doesn’t work for us’. Usually, it is not a model problem. It is a data problem.
Below is how I see Phase 2, in a practical, structured way.
Move from batch to near real-time data flows
Traditional data platforms mostly use batch ETL. A pipeline runs overnight, updates the warehouse, and reports are accurate the next day. GenAI changes this. People want answers right away, based on the most current information.
Data modernisation introduces streaming and event-driven pipelines where they matter. Not everything must be real-time, but the platform must support it when AI depends on it.
Azure example: Use Azure Event Hubs to collect application and business events in real time, storing them in Azure Data Lake Storage (ADLS Gen2) as a single storage base. From there, you can organize data with lakehouse patterns using Microsoft Fabric or Azure Synapse.
Azure example: Use Azure Event Hubs to collect application and business events in real time, storing them in Azure Data Lake Storage (ADLS Gen2) as a single storage base. From there, you can organize data with lakehouse patterns using Microsoft Fabric or Azure Synapse.
Build a lakehouse foundation and treat data as a product
GenAI needs context, and context comes from well-structured data products. This is where lakehouse architectures (combining features of data lakes and warehouses) become powerful: one foundation for both analytics and AI readiness. The key is not only storage, but also the discipline of ‘data products’: ownership, quality, semantics, and lifecycle.
Azure example: Use Microsoft Fabric OneLake to centralize storage, along with Fabric lakehouse and pipelines to create ‘gold datasets’ ready for analytics and GenAI. This approach reduces fragmentation and makes data reusable for different teams.
Make unstructured data usable for GenAI
GenAI is great because it can work with text and documents, not just tables. But enterprise unstructured data is often messy: duplicated files, outdated documents, no metadata, and unclear access rights. If you build Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG; using external data sources to improve AI answers) on top of this, you get unreliable outputs.
Modernising for GenAI means properly preparing unstructured data: chunking, enrichment, embedding, indexing, and access control.
Azure example: using Azure AI Search with vector indexes, generating embeddings with Azure OpenAI, and building an RAG pattern that retrieves enterprise context before answering. This shifts GenAI from ‘confident but wrong’ to ‘grounded and traceable’.
Azure example: using Azure AI Search with vector indexes, generating embeddings with Azure OpenAI, and building an RAG pattern that retrieves enterprise context before answering. This shifts GenAI from ‘confident but wrong’ to ‘grounded and traceable’.
Add metadata, lineage, and governance from day one
Once GenAI uses enterprise knowledge, governance is essential. If you don’t know the source, owner, or sensitivity of data, you risk security and compliance issues. Without governance, GenAI answers are not trustworthy.
That’s why Phase 2 brings in governance tools from the start, not at the end.
Azure example: using Microsoft Purview (tool for cataloguing and governing data) for cataloguing, classification, lineage tracking, and access policies. It helps enforce data boundaries and ensures GenAI does not expose information it shouldn’t.
Azure example: using Microsoft Purview (tool for cataloguing and governing data) for cataloguing, classification, lineage tracking, and access policies. It helps enforce data boundaries and ensures GenAI does not expose information it shouldn’t.
Measure quality and AI readiness continuously
A common mistake is assuming data modernisation is complete once the lakehouse is built. For GenAI, continuous validation of data is necessary to ensure freshness, completeness, uniqueness, access rules, and relevance. If quality decreases, model outputs decline as well.
This step involves setting up quality checks, monitoring pipelines, and creating feedback loops based on how GenAI is used.
Azure example: Use Fabric or Synapse monitoring, along with operational logs and user feedback, to improve data products over time.
Azure example: Use Fabric or Synapse monitoring, along with operational logs and user feedback, to improve data products over time.
Final thought
Phase 2 builds a trusted, unified, governed data foundation with real-time signals and enterprise knowledge retrieval. Without it, GenAI remains a demo; with it, GenAI becomes a scalable product capability.
Comments
Post a Comment