Skip to main content

Vibe Coding and how it changes the way we build and maintain our systems

 These days, AI tools like GitHub Copilot or ChatGPT feel less like helpers and more like real partners in our engineering work. Now comes vibe coding—a funny-sounding idea with huge impact. Vibe coding means working with AI to express our software intentions and context, rather than focusing solely on precise code. It shakes up how we think about writing, fixing, and running software.

Building on this, for years, code was our bridge to machines. We sweated over rules, patterns, and clean syntax to make them understand us. But AI gets our intentions now, straight from the vibe, the goal, the context, what we really want. No more line-by-line translation needed.


Of course, this shift isn't without its quirks. The code AI generates isn't always pretty; it might look messy or hard for humans to read. But that's okay. Future SRE and support won't be people, they'll be AI agents. These agents regenerate logic, fix bugs, and tweak things without whining about style. They just need the big picture to get the job done. Computation and storage are cheaper, and the focus is less on performance and more on cost when we talk about standard lines-of-business applications.
Think about electronics. These days, no one fixes a TV board at home. We swap out parts or the whole thing; it’s just too complex. It’s the same with low-level code. Very few still write processor firmware directly. Abstractions now do the work. Vibe coding pushes this even further.
This abstraction will be clear in daily work with Azure, GitHub Copilot and other technologies within 9-12 months. We say: "Build a Function App with Event Hub, Azure SQL, private endpoint, and VNet." Boom, Terraform code appears, with tags, diagnostics, and smart SKUs. Not perfect, but solid to start. Maintenance? AI agents handle drifts, updates, or region swaps by reading the original intent.
We already see the future of vibe coding through the new GitHub Copilot agents. For example, Copilot Edits can rewrite whole files or modules just from a simple instruction like “refactor to use dependency injection” or “add retry logic to Event Hub calls.” You no longer think about syntax or patterns; you just express the intention, and the agent reshapes the code around it.
Copilot Workspace goes even further by generating full projects from a description. You can say, “Create an Azure Function with Event Hub, Azure SQL, and Terraform infrastructure,” and it automatically builds the structure, modules, and configuration. It acts almost like a junior engineer who understands your architectural vibe and fills in the details.
Other agents, such as Copilot Actions, are starting to take over SRE-style tasks. They fix CI/CD pipelines, update Terraform workflows, rotate secrets, or patch deployment logic based on natural-language guidance. This is exactly the world vibe coding points to: humans define the direction, and AI handles the building, refactoring, and ongoing support.
The big shift? Humans stop coding the details. We set strategy, creativity, and constraints. AI glues it all and keeps it running. Engineers evolve, as we did with cloud, first scared, then leading.
Future generations may express surprise that previous engineers wrote code manually, line by line. This reaction is analogous to how some now view earlier approaches to electronics repair.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...