Skip to main content

The radiography of a modern Line of Business Application

Do you remember what a LOB (Line of Business) application used to look like 15 years ago? One or multiple virtual machines, .NET 3.5, web and desktop applications and a SQL Server database. 

Cloud was one of the catalysts that helped large organisations to change how a LOB application is built and designed. In this article, we do a radiography of a modern LOB application. 


Nowadays, we build IT solutions using container-based technologies. What we will use in 10 years, we don't know. Technology is changing so fast to understand how serverless will impact the ways of designing and building a new generation of software. But for now, microservices, together with Kubernetes and managed cloud services, change how we build, run and manage our software. 

Front Office

The front office runs on top of a Kubernetes cluster and exposes an API for internal and external users and systems. An Azure Load Balancer is configured on top of the cluster with Azure API Management, with a preconfigured and powerful WAF (Azure Web Application Firewall). 

The web content is provided through App Services, which accesses the LOB API through the Azure API Management. The dynamic web content is served over Azure Front Door, offering a global entry point for all requests. Static content is also handled by Azure Front Door, together with Azure CDN and a public Azure Blob Storage.

A part of API security concerns is moved outside the computation units and microservices to Azure WAF, Front Door and API Management. 

Azure Redis Cache and Azure Cosmos DB or Azure SQL are successfully used to optimise the Front Office. Most of the monitoring is done over Azure App Insights powered by Azure Monitor.


Business Logic

The backend system runs in the same way as Front Office inside a Kubernetes cluster in a microservice approach. The communication with Front Office is done indirectly using Azure Event Grid, together with Azure Event Hub and Azure Service Bus. Direct API communication between the two layers is based on events and messages to provide scalability capabilities and improve latency. 

Like the Front Office, Azure App Insights and Azure Monitor are used to log and monitor. In addition to Azure CosmosDB and Azure SQL, Azure Data Lake can be used to store a large amount of data, that it is consumed by Azure Synapse Analytics.  



Back Office

The more complex system might require a back-office system to communicate with external systems. This can be achieved easily by a Kubernetes cluster that hosts the adapters for each external system. 

This layer might require Azure CosmosDB, Redis Cache. Azure SQL for storing the content. Storage is needed, especially when you have an async communication and the external system is not available to communicate with.  

As for the rest of the layers, monitoring and logging can be done successfully with App Insights and Azure Monitoring. 


Wait?! What?... Do I really need 3 different AKS instances for each layer?

NO, you don't. You can use only one instance or Kubernetes cluster when a service mesh like Istio. Depending on compliance reqs, complexity and your specific need, you can end up with the above approach. 

In financial services or banking, where PCI-DSS is required or in healthcare (HIPPA), there are big chances to end up with the above approach. 

What about other services?

Some additional services are required from a security and automation perspective. App Config, together with Key Vault, needs to be on our list, and for IAM, Azure AD and Azure Policies are almost mandatory. 

For backup solutions, Azure Backup Service needs to go hand-in-hand with Azure Container Registry and Azure DevOps. It's excellent for your pipelines and development & release strategy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see