Skip to main content

HTTP Queue Length and Request counter of Azure App Services (Web Apps)

Auto scaling of App Services and Web Application it is a feature that is available for some time inside Microsoft Azure. Beside standard metrics like CPU, Memory and Data In/Out there is a specific web metric that can be used for scaling – HTTP Queue Length.

Counter definition
It is important to know from beginning what does this metric represents. The name of the metric can create confusion especially if you used in the past IIS or similar services. The counter that can be accessed from Azure Portal represents the total number of active requests inside W3WP. The technical path of the counter would be “W3SVC_W3WP – Active_Requests_ - _Total”.

Naming confusion
This metric created confusion in the past, so it was renamed from HTTP Queue Length to Requests and shows the total number of requests in a specific moment in time. This change was done only in the Metric Monitor part of the Azure Portal.
Inside auto scale section of „Scale out” you will find this metrics called „HttpQueueLength”, but remember that they represents the same counter.


What does this metric represents
This counter represents the total number of active requests to our App Services. For example if we have 5 clients connected in that moment to our App Service, this means that the number of HttpQueueLength will be 5.
This value is relevant especially for two kind of applications. First are the applications that are hit by high number of requests and the requests processing time is short. The second case is when we have requests that are executed for long period of time, which could put pressure to our backend system.

Should I use inside for Auto-Scaling
Yes and No. This is a tricky question. This is that kind of counter that if you analyze it separately if will not provide too much information related to the current load of the system and if you need to scale up/down.
Taking into account the length of the requests, you might realize that there is direct impact on the quality of service if you have 100 requests in parallel that takes 10 minutes and consume 80% of CPU or 1000 requests in parallel that takes 0.2 seconds.
Do not start to use this metric from day 0. Try to gather historical data and see how you can combine this metrics with other counters that are provided by App Services. I recommend to start with simple counters like CPU or Memory. After a while, based on historical data and how the system behave you can decide to use Http Queue Length counter.

Final thoughts 
First, remember that Http Queue Length and Requests are the same metrics. They represents the total number of requests in a specific moment in time. Be careful on how you use this metrics combined with auto scale because false-positive actions might occur. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...