Skip to main content

Multiple Staging Deployment of Azure Web Sites using Slots

How are you dealing the website management before going live with a new version? I have in mind different environments like production, testing, integration, development, persist the old version of the web site into a location that give you possibility to swap between the new one and old one if you have issues.


If you are using Azure Websites you will discover a new feature that gives you the possibility to have multiple staging environments live in the same time. Switching between them is done in real time. Before going further, you should know two things. One, we are not referring to staging environment, this is something more that staging and this feature is available only for Standard plan.
From now, you can deploy a new version of your web site into a separate slot, that is isolated 100% from the production one. There you can test how it’s behave, performance issues and so on. You can have as many slots as you want, each slot is accessible using a unique URL. Anytime, you can switch between them, putting another slot in production (swap). When a swap is done, the web site that was in production will replace the slot with is going in production. The mechanism is pretty simple, because in your slots, the websites are already loaded, resources allocated and so on. Only the DNS is changed. In this way the downtime is eliminated and no requests are dropped.
If during a SWAP something bad is happening and an error occurs, Azure will make automatically a rollback and the original version will be restored.
Be aware, you will pay for each slot that you have, like a normal website. For example if you have 2 slots (INT and TESTING) and another slot that is live, that you will pay 3 X Standard Web Sites.
When you create a new slot, you have the possibility to clone the configuration also. This is a pretty nice feature, especially when you have custom configuration in place. When you make s swap between slots the fallowing information will change:

  • Connection strings
  • General, Diagnostic and Monitoring setting
  • Handler Mapping

Also, there are other configuration that are not changed when you make a swap:

  • Publishing endpoints
  • Scale settings
  • Custom Domain Name
  • Bindings and SSL Certificates

I really like that scale settings are not swap between instances. In this way, we can have in slots normal configuration (one instance of our websites) and in production to have 10 or 20, based on our needs. Don’t forget that database connection string is changed when a swap is made. Because of this you need to change the one from slot to the production one before making a swap.
If you want to find more about this please visit http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/web-sites-staged-publishing/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Database Modernization Matters for AI

  When companies transition to the cloud, they typically begin with applications and virtual machines, which is often the easier part of the process. The actual complexity arises later when databases are moved. To save time and effort, cloud adoption is more of a cloud migration in an IaaS manner, fulfilling current, but not future needs. Even organisations that are already in the cloud find that their databases, although “migrated,” are not genuinely modernised. This disparity becomes particularly evident when they begin to explore AI technologies. Understanding Modernisation Beyond Migration Database modernisation is distinct from merely relocating an outdated database to Azure. It's about making your data layer ready for future needs, like automation, real-time analytics, and AI capabilities. AI needs high throughput, which can be achieved using native DB cloud capabilities. When your database runs in a traditional setup (even hosted in the cloud), in that case, you will enc...

Cloud Myths: Migrating to the cloud is quick and easy (Pill 2 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

The idea that migration to the cloud is simple, straightforward and rapid is a wrong assumption. It’s a common misconception of business stakeholders that generates delays, budget overruns and technical dept. A migration requires laborious planning, technical expertise and a rigorous process.  Migrations, especially cloud migrations, are not one-size-fits-all journeys. One of the most critical steps is under evaluation, under budget and under consideration. The evaluation phase, where existing infrastructure, applications, database, network and the end-to-end estate are evaluated and mapped to a cloud strategy, is crucial to ensure the success of cloud migration. Additional factors such as security, compliance, and system dependencies increase the complexity of cloud migration.  A misconception regarding lift-and-shits is that they are fast and cheap. Moving applications to the cloud without changes does not provide the capability to optimise costs and performance, leading to ...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...