Skip to main content

AngularJS - Handling custom HTTP error codes

In this post we will talk about how we can manage on AngularJS, errors like access forbidden or unauthorized. Also we will see what kind of errors we need to throw from a MVC (WebAPI) application.
First off all, don’t try to manage the response error of each HTTP request. You should register an interceptor to HTTP request and manage there all the HTTP errors. Only custom behavior should be managed manually per request.
In the below example we register an HTTP interceptor that redirect the user to the login page when the user is unauthorized to access to access that resources (is not logged in). If you don’t manage the 401 error on the client side, the default behavior of browsers is to display the popup windows where user needs to insert his credentials (Windows Authentification), even if you have another authentication in parallel (Windows Auth. combined with token base – OWIN for example)
In the case he is not allowed to access that resources we display an alert that notify user about this.
var Services = Services || {};
Services.httpCustomInterceptorService = function ($q, $location) {

    var httpCustomInterceptorServiceFactory = {};   

    var responseError = function (rejection) {
        if (rejection.status == 401) {            
            $location.path('/login');
        }
        if (rejection.status === 403) {
            alert('Forbidden - you are not allowed to access this resource');
        }        
        return $q.reject(rejection);
    }
  
    httpCustomInterceptorServiceFactory.responseError = responseError;

    return httpCustomInterceptorServiceFactory;
};

Services.httpCustomInterceptorService.$inject = ['$q', '$location'];
You can register this interceptor using the fallowing line of code:
$httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpCustomInterceptorService');
This HTTP errors codes can be thrown by an MVC custom attribute for example:
401: throw new HttpResponseException(new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized));
403: throw new HttpResponseException(new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.Forbidden));

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provi...