Skip to main content

OWIN and Katana

OWIN and Katana. This two words are now the buzz words in Web development over Microsoft technologies. I heard pretty often this two buzz words used, but without knowing very clear what is OWIN and what is Katana. The main scope of this post is to define this two new terms and determine when we should talk about OWN and when we should talk about Katana.
OWIN comes from Open Web Interface for .NET and is an abstraction level between our web application and .NET web server infrastructure. This mean that from now on we will be able to host our web applications on different web servers, not only on IIS.
Until now the only possibility to host a web application written in .NET was using IIS. OWIN is here to help us. Because OWN define the abstraction level between the web server and web application we can now start to develop owner own web servers or integrate it in existing one.
It is important to know that OWIN only defines the specification of this layer and not the real implementation. Based on this specification we can create and integrate a middleware layer between our web application and the request/response. For example in this way we can change the request before arriving to our web application without having to change our web application or create a custom component for IIS (creating a custom component for IIS is not wrong, but cannot be reused on other web servers).
Katana comes with the implementation of web server made by Microsoft. It represents only an implementation of OWIN that can be used to host our web application. I expect in the future to see different implementation of OWIN for Mono that will run on Linux system and why not on Android.
I think that most of us already saw the demo where using OWIN we were able to self-host a web application in a console application. Using Katana we can do a lot of crazy things and we will be able to create and deploy different tools and web application faster and easily and we don’t need IIS anymore to host web application.
This is great especially in the development and testing step, where managing 3-5 versions of the application could be pretty complicated.
Porting between different platforms is pretty cool for small and simple application. Think about the following scenario. We create a web application that can be used in our home to search pictures shared in our network. We will be able to develop in in .NET and hosting it on a Raspberry PI using Mono.
Another good example is related to Authentication, that can be done now very easily over OWIN. We can support now Facebook, Google and other providers extremely simple.
Why we should use Katana? Well, we don’t need. It is optionally, but using Katana we will have more flexibilities because of OWIN specification. Also, expect that in the future, to see and hear about Katana more and more often.
Now with OWIN we can:

In conclusion. OWIN is the abstraction level between our web application and web server. Katana is the implementation of OWIN made by Microsoft.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see