Skip to main content

[Code refactoring] Multiple Threads - Locks and Mutex

Each of us know what is lock and what its purpose is. It is used to block a critical section of code – the statements from the lock block will be executed only by one thread at the same time.
public class Foo
{
  FooConnection con;
  
  public void OpenConnection()
  {
    ...
    con.Open();
  }

  public void CloseConnection()
  {
    ...
    con.Close();    
  }

  public void Write(...)
  {
    ...
    con.Write(...);
  }
  
  public object Read()
  {
    ...
    ... con.Read();
    ...
  }
}

...
Foo foo = ...;
foo.OpenConnection();
foo.Read();
foo.Read();
...
foo.Read();
foo.RWRWRWR..();
foo.CloseConnection();
Being in a multi-thread environment problems with multiple access to the same resources appeared, information started to be corrupted and many more. For example, multiple read and write started to execute at the same time and having only one connection (cursor) the information retrieved was corrupted.
Because there was only one instance of Foo, locks were added to Read and Write operations. They could not add locks in the locations where Read and Write methods because there were different flows and combinations.

  public void Write(...)
  {
    lock(padLock)
    {
      ...
      con.Write(...);
    }
  }
  
  public object Read()
  {
    lock(padLock)
    {
      ...
      ... con.Read();
      ...
    }
  }
The application started to work better, but they still observed that from time to time they have the same concurrence problems that cause the application to crash.
Can you spot the problem?
Even if lock block the access to a critical section, this is not the solution for our case. We need to make Read/Write operations atomic and to not allow a Read or Write operation to be executed in the same time.
To resolve this problem we have two simple solutions. The most simple fix, that would work for short time is using a Mutex. It is a synchronization primitive similar with a semaphore that has the size 1.
public class Foo
{
  FooConnection con;
  Mutex mutex = new Mutex();
  
  public void OpenConnection()
  {
    ...
    con.Open();
  }

  public void CloseConnection()
  {
    ...
    con.Close();    
  }

  public void Write(...)
  {
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...
    con.Write(...);
    mutex.ReleaseMutex();    
  }
  
  public object Read()
  {    
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...
    ... con.Read();
    ...
    mutex.ReleaseMutex();
  }
}
Using a Mutex, we can ensure that only one thread will execute the code from Read or Write block. We will not have cases when on one thread execute the Read method and the other one executes the Write operation.
Other solutions could be used based on transaction or connection pattern (similar with the one that we use in ORM framework.

Comments

  1. There is only one way that the Mutex would work, and that is making the application run slower. Because Mutex is an interprocess communication synchronization object, being therefore heavier than the use of a simple lock. So this works as long as you want interprocess communication locking.

    The first method should've worked... but it is more likely that the problem is caused by the fact that one of the threads closed the resource too fast or opened the resource too late. First of all, you want to add locking around opening and closing, and second of all, you want to clear that handle when it's closed/not opened.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...