Skip to main content

Quality Attributes Scenario Components

When we are talking about the quality attributes of an application we risk to talk all night without approaching the end of the topic. The main scope of this article is to see what are the main components of a scenario that can define a quality attribute.
There are a lot of quality attributes that can be involved. There are 6 attributes that are very common and extremely important in a solution:
  1. Availability
  2. Modifiability
  3. Performance
  4. Security
  5. Testability
We saw the most important quality attributes and it would be very easy for us to find another 10. All this attributes are executed based on a predefined scenario. The components of the scenario can be isolated and used to identify, describe and understand each attribute.
Each quality attribute has a SOURCE OF STIMULUS. There is an entity that generates the stimulus. In a simple scenario we can have a person, but the stimulus can be another system, a handler or even a specific time. This stimulus is the source that triggers the specific action, event or any kind of behavior. For example we can imagine as a stimulus the person who starts the computer.
Beside source of stimulus we have the STIMULUS. This represents the condition that needs to be taking into account when the stimulus arrives into the system. For example the “desire” to start the computer. It is very important to understand that the source of stimulus and stimulus itself are two different thing and don’t need to be combined. Different sources of stimulus can produce the same stimulus but the measurements can be different. For example is not the same thing to have as source of stimulus the person that is near the computer and can push the start button or when we have a person that is 1000 km away and need to fly to the specific location to start the system.
The 3th part of an attribute is the ENVIRONMENT. The action is executed in a specific scenario, were specific resources are available or certain components are active. Because of this the environment is very important for each scenario. For example the hardware configuration of the system where the operation system is installed. It is not the same thing to run a Windows 8 or on a i7 or on a Pentium 4.
Next thing of quality attribute scenario are ARTIFACTS. These can represent only a part of a system or the whole system. This represents the component/system that is measured. There are cases when we want to measure all the system or we need to measure only a part of a system (for example the module that initializes the kernel of operation system). Any action that is executed will generate a response.
 The 5th item is RESPONSE. The response is not all the time visible to the source of stimulus. For example starting operating system of a server that doesn’t has a monitor represent a state change of the running system.
From the moment when the stimulus is generated to the moment when the response is send we need to measure different parameters. These form the last item of our scenario which has been named RESPONSE SCENARIO.  Each response needs to be measurable in one way or another. In our example, the most important thing can be how long the operation system needs to start, but in other cases we can have different parameters (e.g. the monitor).

These are the components that form the scenarios that are used for quality attributes. When we are trying to define the quality attributes of a system we should think about this 6 components.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...