Skip to main content

Data Model for Reporting over Windows Azure Tables (part 2)

Part 1
In the last post we talked a little about how we can calculate TOP 5 visited URLs per day for each user and TOP 5 visited URL anytime. For these cases I propose some ways on how we can store information on Windows Azure Table in a way that we can generate these reports.
In today post we will see how we can resolve the concurrence problem. We can have 10, 20 or 100 commands that want to execute over the same entity from Windows Azure Table. Because of this we need to guaranty that the writer has the last version of the entity before update it. If we will not be able to guaranty this… than our reporting solution will be compromised.
Windows Azure Table comes with a simple solution. Each entity that is stored on tables contains a unique key named ETag. ETag is changed every time when the entity is updated or changed. Based on this value we can know if we have the last version of an entity or the entity was changed from the moment when we receive it. ETag is the secret that give us support for concurrency access to Windows Azure Storage (Tables and Blobs).
Each entity that is retrieved from Windows Azure Tables has the ETag set. When someone will update any field from the given entity, the ETag value will be changed. In the moment when another user tries to make an update with an invalid ETag, the merge option feature will be used.
The data context contains a merge option filed that can be set manually. Based on this value, we can provide a custom behavior when a conflict appears. The values that are supported for MergeOption enum are:
  1. AppendOnly (default value)
  2. OverwriteChanges
  3. PreserveChanges
  4. NoTracking
For a description of this values please take a look here.
We saw that Windows Azure tables already have support for object “versioning” and automatic detecting and resolve merge conflict.
This can be used with success in our problem, when  in the case when the entity was update by another client we will need to retrieve the last version of the entity and update it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...