Skip to main content

Data Model for Reporting over Windows Azure Tables (part 2)

Part 1
In the last post we talked a little about how we can calculate TOP 5 visited URLs per day for each user and TOP 5 visited URL anytime. For these cases I propose some ways on how we can store information on Windows Azure Table in a way that we can generate these reports.
In today post we will see how we can resolve the concurrence problem. We can have 10, 20 or 100 commands that want to execute over the same entity from Windows Azure Table. Because of this we need to guaranty that the writer has the last version of the entity before update it. If we will not be able to guaranty this… than our reporting solution will be compromised.
Windows Azure Table comes with a simple solution. Each entity that is stored on tables contains a unique key named ETag. ETag is changed every time when the entity is updated or changed. Based on this value we can know if we have the last version of an entity or the entity was changed from the moment when we receive it. ETag is the secret that give us support for concurrency access to Windows Azure Storage (Tables and Blobs).
Each entity that is retrieved from Windows Azure Tables has the ETag set. When someone will update any field from the given entity, the ETag value will be changed. In the moment when another user tries to make an update with an invalid ETag, the merge option feature will be used.
The data context contains a merge option filed that can be set manually. Based on this value, we can provide a custom behavior when a conflict appears. The values that are supported for MergeOption enum are:
  1. AppendOnly (default value)
  2. OverwriteChanges
  3. PreserveChanges
  4. NoTracking
For a description of this values please take a look here.
We saw that Windows Azure tables already have support for object “versioning” and automatic detecting and resolve merge conflict.
This can be used with success in our problem, when  in the case when the entity was update by another client we will need to retrieve the last version of the entity and update it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

What to do when you hit the throughput limits of Azure Storage (Blobs)

In this post we will talk about how we can detect when we hit a throughput limit of Azure Storage and what we can do in that moment. Context If we take a look on Scalability Targets of Azure Storage ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/storage-scalability-targets/ ) we will observe that the limits are prety high. But, based on our business logic we can end up at this limits. If you create a system that is hitted by a high number of device, you can hit easily the total number of requests rate that can be done on a Storage Account. This limits on Azure is 20.000 IOPS (entities or messages per second) where (and this is very important) the size of the request is 1KB. Normally, if you make a load tests where 20.000 clients will hit different blobs storages from the same Azure Storage Account, this limits can be reached. How we can detect this problem? From client, we can detect that this limits was reached based on the HTTP error code that is returned by HTTP