Skip to main content

Windows Azure Table - How to chunk commands in batches of 100 items

Based on what kind of data store we are using, there are cases when the size of a batch is limited. For example if we want to execute an update batch command over Windows Azure Tables we will notify that the maxim size of a batch is 100. Also all the updated command needs to be on the same partition key.
What should we do if we have a batch that with more than 100 items. The simples’ solution is to create groups of chunks of 100 items and execute and execute them in parallel. In the next part of the post we will see how we can create chunks of items from a list:
List<Foo> items = new List<Foo>();
….
int chunkSize = 100;
List<List<Foo>> chunks = new List<List<Foo>>();
int index = 0;
int itemsCount = items.Count;
while( index < itemsCount )
{
int count = itemsCount > chunkSize
        ? itemsCount
        : index;
Chunks.Add( items.GetRange( index, count));
}
After this step if we need to execute the update command over the table context we can do this very easily:
foreach( var chunk in chunks )
{
    // execute the update command using the Save command.
}
In this post we saw how we can create chunks of items to be able to execute different command on them. If we don’t do this step we will get error when we will try, for example, to update 101 items using only a batch command.

Comments

  1. An useful post!
    Based on your idea, I wrote the following complete generic methods:

    https://gist.github.com/4410294

    (I tried to put the code here but it lost formating)
    Lucian

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…