Skip to main content

How we can remove millions of entities from a Windows Azure Table (part 2)

In one of my latest post I tacked about how we can remove a lot of entities from Windows Azure – deleting the table.
This solution works but we will have to face up with an odd problem. When we are deleting a table, we only mark it for deletion, our client will not be able to access the table and in background Windows Azure will start deleting the table. If we have a table with millions of entities will face up with a big problem. Until Windows Azure will finish deletion of the table will not be able to create a new table with the same time.
This can be a blocker. We don’t want to wait 4 hours, until our table is deleted to be able to recreate another one.
And here is a big BUT. We can be smart and use ListTables. Basically we can create another table that have the name something like [MyTableName]+[Guid] and using ListTable method to retrieve the name of our table only using [MyTableName].
Using this solution, we can add mark our old table for delegation and create a new table with a similar name where we can store our entities. In this way we will be able to remove items from a table in only a few seconds.  Even if this “virtual” clean it works great and can speed up our applications.
The following code can be used to delete a table:
CloudTableClient tableStorage = new CloudTableClient([tableUri],[credential]);
string tableName = [MyTableName];
tableName = tableStorage.ListTables(tableName).FirstOrDefault();
if (tableName != null)
{
  tableStorage.DeleteTableIfExist(tableName);
}
The following code can be used to retrieve the name of our table and recreate a new table of don’t exist:
string tableName = tableStorage.ListTables([MyTableName]).FirstOrDefault();
if (tableName == null)
{
  tableName = [MyTableName] + Guid.NewGuid();
  tableStorage.CreateTableIfNotExist(tableName);
}

The only downside of this solution is that there are some seconds when we will not have a table where clients can access it. If we can leave with this solution and we can manage this problem on the client side than we can use it without any kind of problem.

Comments

  1. The question is: why/when would you need to do something like this is a real application? :)
    (sure, for testing/debugging scenarios it might be useful, but other than that..)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are times when you need to clean a table very fast. For example a table that store the assignment between updates and system where this update is available.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provi...