Skip to main content

DataContract and XMLIgnore attribute

By
Intr-un post anterior am discutat despre cum putem sa serializam un IDictionary in format XML. In mod normal o clasa care nu este decorata cu atributul DataContract o sa poata fi serializata folosind DataContractSerializer fara nici o problema. In acest caz, toate proprietatiile si field-urile publice o sa fie serializate.
In specificatiile la DataContractSerializer, ne este specificat ca orice atribut folosit pentru serializare in format XML (XmlIgnore, XmlArray, Serializable etc.) sunt ignorate. Totusi cand obiectul de mai jos era serializat, atributul XmlIgnore este luat in considerare.
public Foo
{
    public string Name
    {
        get;
        set;
    }
    [XmlIgnore]
    public string Value
    {
        get;
        private set;
    }
}
In prima faza cea ce se intampla este destul de ciudat. In mod normal acesta nu ar trebui sa fie ignorat, dar practic proprietatea este ignorata in totalitate.
In realitate DataContractSerializer functioneaza asa cum ne-am astepta. Dar daca ne uitam mai atenti la modul in care este definita proprietatea Value, putem sa observam ca set-ul este private. DataContractSerializer serializeaza toate proprietatiile publice, iar Value nu este public. Aceasta are doar get-erul public, iar set-erul este private. Cu sau fara atributul XmlIgnore, aceasta proprietate nu este serializata.
Enjoy!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

By
After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

By
In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...
Post a Comment
Read more

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

By
Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...
8 comments
Read more