Skip to main content

Opt greseli de design care ne pot afecta aplicatia

Am inceput sa studiez design patterns si am inceput cu o carte de a celor de la Gof (Gang of Four). In aceasta carte am gasit opt greseli de design care ne pot afecta aplicatia:
  1. Crearea unui obiect folosind numele unei clase explicit. In acest fel ajungem sa fim legati direct de o anumita implementare. Pentru a evita acest lucru putem sa folosim o interfata, iar instanta sa o cream in mod indirect, de exemplu printr-un factory.
  2. Dependinte directe fata de sistemul hardware sau software. In cazul in care aplicatia noastra depinde in mod direct de anumite resurse ale sistemului portabilitatea scade in mod direct. Pentru aceaste cazuri putem sa incercam sa folosim un patern precum bridge, pentru a scadea dependintele.
  3. Dependintele fata de o anumita operatie. Cand specificam o anumita operatie, limitam ca lucrurile sa se intample intr-o singura varianta si numai una. Modificările care o sa apara in viitor o sa necesite mai mult timp, deoarece totul este hard-codat.
  4. Dependinta fata de algoritm. De obicei pe parcursul dezvoltării unei aplicatii un algoritm se schimba, din aceasta cauza algoritmii ar trebuii sa fie izolati si schimbati cu usurinta.
  5. Extinderea functionalitatilor prin subclase. In momentul in care trebuie sa adaugam o noua functionalitate, putem foarte simplu sa mostenim din clasa parinte si sa adaugam o noua functionalitate. Dar acest lucru implica sa cunoastem foarte bine clasa de baza, iar in timp poate sa duca la existenta unui numar foarte mari de clase. Acest lucru se poate rezolva prin delegation si composition. Aceste doua mecanisme ne permite sa adaugam functionalitati fara sa avem o inlantuire de subclase.
  6. Clase strans legate intre ele. In momentul in care ajungem sa avem o colectie de clase care sunt strans legate intre ele sistemul devine monolit. Orice modificare ajunge sa fie extrem de greu de facut si necesita cunoasterea foarte buna a sistemului.
  7. Imposibilitatea de a modifica anumite clase. Uneori avem nevoie sa modificam clase la care nu avem acces la codul sursa sau necesita modificarea unui numar mare de subclase. Pentru a evita acest lucru putem sa folosim Adapter sau Visitator pattern.
  8. Dependinte directa fata de un obiect sau o implementare. Este reprezentat in cazul in care o clasa conoaste modul in care o alta clasa functioneaza si este implementat. Modificarea aceste clase poate sa cauzeze modificari in cascada la toate clasele care folosesc clasa respectiva.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_pattern#Gang_of_Four

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provi...