Skip to main content

Message queue - cum sa oprim consumul de message dintr-un queue

Pornim de la următorul caz:
Avem o aplicatie ce ruleaza 24h pe zi, 7 zile pe saptamana. Aceasta consuma mesaje din mai multe queue. Pentru a putea asculta la queue avem următorul cod:
System.Messaging.MessageQueue msmq = new MessageQueue(".\\private$\\exemplu");
msmq .ReceiveCompleted += m_ReceiveCompleted;
msmq .BeginReceive();
...
void m_ReceiveCompleted(object sender, ReceiveCompletedEventArgs e)
{
Console.WriteLine(DateTime.Now.ToString());

MessageQueue msmq = (MessageQueue) sender;
msmq.BeginReceive();
}
Intr-un anumit moment, dorim sa oprim consumul de mesaje din queue. Pentru acest lucru apelam
msmq.Close()
Dar avem o surpriza. Mesajele sunt în continuare consuma de către aplicație. Orice am face sau apela acestea sunt în continuare consumate. Pe msdn dacă citim cu atenție pagina care descrie metoda Close() o sa gasim
Close does not always free the read and write handles to a queue, because they might be shared.
Deși pare ciudat la prima vedere metoda Close() eliberează resursele folosite de instanta. Nu oprește instanta sa nu mai consume și alte mesaje din queue.
Solutia pe care o propun este sa ne dezabonam de la evenimentul de ReceiveCompleted înainte sa apelam Close():
msmq.ReceiveCompleted -= m_ReceiveCompleted;
msmq.Close();
O alta solutie ati putea spune ce este ca în metoda ReceiveCompleted sa nu mai apelam BeginReceive() cînd anumite condiții sunt îndeplinite. Problema in cazul acesta ar fi ca noi deja am consuma un mesaj de pe queue, deși poate nu ar trebuii sa consuma mesajul respectiv.
Aceasta problema se poate manifesta și în cadrul unit test-elor, cînd mesajele din queue dispar pur și simplu și nu mai ajung la cine trebuie( cazul în care în mai multe unit teste consuma același queue, iar instantele la MessageQueue sunt statice).

Voi aveți alte soluții la aceasta problema?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...