Skip to main content

Care este cea mai rapida metoda pentru a obtine index-ul unui element din IEnumerable

De cate ori nu v-ati lovit de acest caz? Sa aveti un obiect de tip enumerable si sa fim nevoiti sa obtineti indexul unui element.
Exista mai multe metode pentru a rezolva aceasta problema, cea mai simpla din ele este:
obj.ToList().FindIndex( x => x =="Blog" )
Pentru cazul in care am cautat elementul care are valoarea "Blog".
Daca ne punem problema vitezei putem sa scriem noi o metoda popie:
public static int FindIndex<T>(this IEnumerable<T> elemente, Predicate<T> conditie)
{
int index = 0;
foreach (var item in elemente)
{
if (conditie(item))
{
return index;
}
index++;
}
return -1;
}
Prima optiune ne sperie putin din cauta la ToList(). Ne punem problema performantei, am prefera parca sa nu folosim ToList() si sa mergem pe metoda scrisa de noi.
elemente.Select((item, index) => new { item, index })
.Where(p => p.item == "Blog")
.Select(p => p.index + 1)
.FirstOrDefault() - 1;
Ce am facut mai sus? Nimic complicat, am obtinut toate elementele din enumeratie sub forma (element, index). Daca nu stiati Select-ul ne permite acest lucru, ne poate fi de ajutor aceasta metoda in multe alte situatii. Apoi am selectat doar elementele care respecta conditia, iar apoi am selectat index-ul la acest element. FistOrDefault ne garanteaza ca acest algoritm se va oprii dupa ce a gasit primul element care indeplineste conditia data. M-am folosit de +1 si -1 la Select si la FirstOrDefault pentru a putea avea rezultatul -1 cand nu se gaseste nici un element in enumeratie ce sa indeplineasca conditia data.
Mai exista si alte mecanisme, folosind TakeWhile.
Problema nu este neaparat cum, ci care este mai optim mecanism.
Desii e greu de crezut cel mai rapid mecanism este ToList().FistIndex(). Se pare ca nu intoadeauna un cod scris de mana este mai rapid ca si un API default oferit de catre .NET, chiar daca vorbim de LINQ.

Comments

  1. Interesant - ai facut niste masuratori ca sa vezi cu cat e mai rapida metoda ce foloseste LINQ/Select ?
    (la prima metoda, nu mi-e prea clar de ce era nevoie sa se foloseasca ToList())

    ReplyDelete
  2. Problema e ca query-ul scris cu LINQ e gresit. Punand clauza Select((item, index) => new { item, index }) prima, am invalidat tot lazy-loading-ul care il ofera LINQ.
    Corect ar fi:
    elemente.Where(p => p.item == "Blog")
    .Select((item, index) => new { item, index })
    .FirstOrDefault();

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…