Skip to main content

Parametrii opționali - posibile probleme la versionare

Cu toții am auzit de parametrii opționali. VB suporta de foarte multa vreme. Începînd cu .NET 4.0 si C# suporta parametrii opționali.
Pe scurt parametrii opționali iți permit să ai parametrii la o metoda cu o valoarea default. A.i. acești parametrii pot fi omiși din apel.
public static void Example(string s1, string s2 = "2",
string
s3 = "3")
{
Console.WriteLine(s3);
}
Apelul poate să fie de forma următoare:
Example("1","21","31");
Example("1");
Example("1","2");
Dar ce se întîmpla dacă avem doua versiune de assemply. In noua versiune va hotărați să adaugăm metoda:
public static void Example(string s1, string s3 = "3")
{
Console.WriteLine(s3);
}

Apel:
Example("1","2");
Dacă nu recompilam clientul, dar adaugăm noua versiune de assembly, metoda apelata o să fie tot cea din prima versiune. Dar ce se întîmpla dacă recompilați clientul cu a doua versiune de assembly? Fara nici o problema se va apela metoda adăugată in a doua versiune de assembly.

Acuma o să spuneți ca ceea ce se întîmpla este normal. 100% corect. Dar problema apare cu adevărat cînd adaugați un nou overload la o metoda cu parametrii opționali care are mai putini parametrii decît prima metoda, ca in exemplul de mai sus. Toate apelurile care spre metoda veche o să meargă spre noua metoda, ceea ce poate să ducă la un comportament neașteptat.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...