Skip to main content

Tools, templates and assessments for the Ready phase of CAF (Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework)

 Microsoft is offering an excellent framework to support cloud migration and adoption process – Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF) 

The framework defined an iterative process with the following phases:

  1. Define Strategy
  2. Plan
  3. Ready
  4. Adopt
  5. Govern
  6. Manage

For each of them, Cloud Adoption Framework (CAF) provides us a list of templates, tools, and assessment mechanisms that can help us to improve the adoption and migration process. Let's take a look at the ones for Ready. 

Azure Setup Guide

Location: https://ms.portal.azure.com/#blade/Microsoft_Azure_Resources/QuickstartPlaybookBlade/guideId/intro-azure-setup 

The first thing you need to do when you start a project is to configure the environments. Ensuring that you have the right governance, security, monitoring in place. 

The guide is providing best practice, with direct links to Azure Portal from where you can configure the recommendations. There are 5 different areas that are covered:

  1. Organize resources
  2. Manage access
  3. Manage costs and billing
  4. Plan governance, security and compliance
  5. Establish monitoring and reporting
Plus a section that provides different resources from where you can find the current status of your services, any updates related to Azure that are available and news related to Azure services and features. 

Naming and Tagging Conventions Tracking Template

The main purpose of this document is to help us to define the conventions that we shall follow at the moment in time when we define tags or create new instances of Azure services. You have the freedom to change the conversions, but keep in mind to take into account all the dimensions that are covered inside the template. In this way to will be able to manage more easily your cloud resources. 

Azure Landing Zone

Complex cloud solutions require more than one Azure Subscription. Concerns like security, networking, scaling are forcing organizations to use multiple subscriptions. Managing them requires extra effort. For this situation, Azure Landing Zone is offering us design areas that cover topics like Identity, Networking topology, Connectivity, Resource organization, enrollment, governance, BCDR, deployment and operation. 
For each design area, we have a list of principles that we need to follow and deployment instructions that can build our initial blueprint (e.g. CAF migrate landing zone).

Ready checklist

A simple list of items that we shall follow at the moment in time where we are preparing to adopt the cloud. The covered areas are Readiness Guide, Landing zone, Blueprint, and Best practices. Very useful if it your first cloud adoption project or program.

CAF Foundation blueprint

Often we forget to define and implement cloud governance. Azure is offering us a lightweight implementation of the core governance principles that we shall have inside our project. Items like:
  1. Azure Policy,
  2. Azure Resource Groups for Apps, Identity, Shared resources and network
  3. Azure Templates
, are created by the framework. Easy to extend, we can use this framework as a starting point for our Azure Governance layout. 

CAF Migration landing zone blueprint

The reality is that most of the time, migrations are similar between each others and there are a set of core principles that are applicable in most of the cases. The landing zone defines a blueprint that can be used with success to define the landing zone for our workloads that we plan to migrate to Azure. 

Terraform modules

We don't build environments and landing zone using the only ARM. Terraform is one of the 3rd parties that it is used to build and manage environemtns. To support teams that already know and use Terraform, especially for multi-cloud scenarios, Microsoft is offering guidance and out of the box modules for Terraform, that can be used to create our landing zone. 

Terraform registry

The modules from the previous item are available inside the Terraform Registry website. In this way, we have one central location from where we can fetch Terraform modules provided by Microsoft. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...