Skip to main content

Events, Delegates, Actions, Tasks with Mutex

Mutex. If you are a developer than you heard about mutex. Mutex are used to ensure that only one thread/process has an exclusive access to a specific sections of the code.
Let’s look over the following code and see if the code is correct or not?
public class Foo
{
  Mutex mutex = new Mutex();
  event SomeActionEvent someActionEvent;

  public void Do()
  {
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...    
    someActionEvent += OnSomeAction();
  }

  public void OnSomeAction(...)
  {
    mutex.ReleaseMutex();
  }  
}
“WaitOne” method is used to block the current thread until we received a release signal – WaitHandler. “ReleaseMutex” is used when we want to release the lock.
The above code release the mutex lock on an event handler that is executed on a different thread. The problem is that we don’t call the release mutex method from the same thread from where we call “WaitOne”. Because of this, the obtained behavior is not the one that we expect.
The same problem will appear if we use mutex in combination with delegates, lambda expression, Action/Func.
public class Foo
{
  Mutex mutex = new Mutex();

  public void Do()
  {
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...    
    MyMethod(()=>
    {
      mutex.ReleaseMutex();      
    });
  }
}
This is not all. We will find this problem when we are using Task. This is happening because each task is/can be executed on a differed thread.
public class Foo
{
  Mutex mutex = new Mutex();

  public void Do()
  {
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...    
    Task.Factory.StartNew(()=>
    {
      ...
      mutex.ReleaseMutex();      
    });
    
  }
}
There are different solutions for this problem from mutex with name to other ways of synchronization. What we should remember about anonymous mutex is that we need to call the release function from the same thread that made the lock.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too