Skip to main content

Events, Delegates, Actions, Tasks with Mutex

Mutex. If you are a developer than you heard about mutex. Mutex are used to ensure that only one thread/process has an exclusive access to a specific sections of the code.
Let’s look over the following code and see if the code is correct or not?
public class Foo
{
  Mutex mutex = new Mutex();
  event SomeActionEvent someActionEvent;

  public void Do()
  {
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...    
    someActionEvent += OnSomeAction();
  }

  public void OnSomeAction(...)
  {
    mutex.ReleaseMutex();
  }  
}
“WaitOne” method is used to block the current thread until we received a release signal – WaitHandler. “ReleaseMutex” is used when we want to release the lock.
The above code release the mutex lock on an event handler that is executed on a different thread. The problem is that we don’t call the release mutex method from the same thread from where we call “WaitOne”. Because of this, the obtained behavior is not the one that we expect.
The same problem will appear if we use mutex in combination with delegates, lambda expression, Action/Func.
public class Foo
{
  Mutex mutex = new Mutex();

  public void Do()
  {
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...    
    MyMethod(()=>
    {
      mutex.ReleaseMutex();      
    });
  }
}
This is not all. We will find this problem when we are using Task. This is happening because each task is/can be executed on a differed thread.
public class Foo
{
  Mutex mutex = new Mutex();

  public void Do()
  {
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...    
    Task.Factory.StartNew(()=>
    {
      ...
      mutex.ReleaseMutex();      
    });
    
  }
}
There are different solutions for this problem from mutex with name to other ways of synchronization. What we should remember about anonymous mutex is that we need to call the release function from the same thread that made the lock.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...