Skip to main content

Certificates and resource management

Last month I had two posts where I tacked a little about certificates in .NET (12).
In this post I want to discuss about resource management when X5099Certificate2 is used. This is applicable for X509Certificate also.
When we use a .NET object we usually check if IDisposable interface is implemented. If yes, than we will call ‘Dispose’ method. But unfortunately X509Certificate don’t implement this interface.
Behind this class there is a handle (SafeCertContextHandle) to unmanaged resources. Because of this, each new instance of the certificate will have a handle to unmanaged resources. If you need to process 2.000 certificates from the store it will be very easy for you to get a wonderful “OutOfMemoryException”.
To be able to release all the resources that are used by a reference to a certificate you will need to call the ‘Reset’ method. This method will release all the resources that are associated with the specific certificate.
X509Certificate2 cert = …
…
cert.Reset();
X509Store has the same story and you will need to call ‘Close’ method.
X509Store store = …
…
store.Close();
The ‘Close’ method is pretty simple to be seen when you look over the methods that are available. The name gives you an hint that there are some resources that needs to be released, but the ‘Reset’ method name don’t help you too much with this. Because of this it is very simple to end up with an “OutOfMemoryException”.
I don’t understand why X509Certificate2 doesn’t implement IDisposable interface. The resource-free idiom should be apply also in this case also.

Comments

  1. Somebody at MS seems to be to busy to implement this:
    http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/414020/x509certificate2-shoud-implement-idisposable-and-call-the-safecertcontext-dispose-method-on-the-safecertcontexthandle-member
    :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The status is 'CLOSED - Won't fixed'. The ticket was open in 2009.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…