Skip to main content

Custom Content Delivery Network Mechanism using Cloud (Azure)

Requirements:
Lets’ imagine an application that need to deliver Excel report in different location of the world. Based on the client origin the application should be able to deliver specific Excel version. The application should be deployed in different location on the world.
The current CDN solution cannot be used because the master node needs to push the content to the slaves (CDN nodes) and the total report size for each slave will be over 20GB.
Non-Cloud solution:
If we would go on a non-cloud solution we should develop an application that is deployed on different location all around the world. Each application should be able to detect the source of the request and provide the specific Excel report. We should also develop a redirecting mechanism/ load balancing solution that is able to redirect the user to a specific node.
Cloud solution:
If we go on a cloud solution, based on Windows Azure we can imagine a master slave solution.
Each slave of our application will have the Excel reports for the country in his region. This slaves will be able to provide reports for the countries in his own region.
Having an application deployed on different data centers give us the possibility to use Traffic Manager. Traffic Manger is an out of the box mechanism that redirect a call to the closest data center where our application is deployed.
We can have our slaves deployed on different data centers around the globe. Each slave will have the reports for the countries that are served by him. When a request is coming from a country that is not served by the specific slave, the request will be redirected to the global slave, which has the reports for all the countries.
This slaves could detect if there to many requests that are coming for a country that is not mapped for their location and trigger an alert of the provisioning action for reports for that country.
Each slave will have an endpoint that will be used to resolve an Excel report request and a storage (blobs) that will be used to store the reports itself. Based on the client attributes, this service will return a URL with a Shared Access Signature (SAS) of a blob storage where the report is stored. Using SAS the access to the content will be controlled.
The solution will contains a master that will manage all the Excel reports from all the nodes. The master will be able to deploy new version of reports, delete the old one and so on from each slave node. Beside this, the master will the one that can trigger the provisioning of a slave with additional countries. The master will contains a storage (blob) with all the reports that exists and are valid and a service that is able to manage and maintain all the slave nodes.
When the provisioning is triggered, the download process to a specific slave should not be done by the master node. Because we can have a lot of slaves, this action consume a lot of resources and can give us a lot of problems. The master node should send a notification to a specific slave that a specific report is available for download/update/delete. In that moment the slave node should receive the notification and trigger the specific action. In this way we are able to move all the load from master to slaves.
The notification mechanism can be done over Service Bus. Each slave node will be represented by a different subscription. When the download/update/delete action is finished, the slave node can send a notification to the master node using a queue or a Service Bus Topic.

Things that I like to this solution:

  • Traffic Manager – Is able to automatically redirect request and when he detect a slave node is down redirect to the next slave
  • SAS – The content of the blob can be shared in a secure manner
  • Slave’s endpoint – If we have slaves that are hit by a lot of clients we can scale up the numbers of instances of that slave without affecting the rest of the slaves
  • Redundancy – When a slave is down all the request will be redirect to the closest slave
  • Report resolver – When a report cannot be resolve by a specific slave, the request is resolve by the global slave that is able not only to log this issues but also he can notify the master node about this incident. In this way the master node can trigger custom action like provisioning
  • Scalability – Each slave can scale independently based on the load
  • Provisioning mechanism – The provisioning is made using the slave processor resource. In this way the master node will not have peaks
  • Service Bus – Notifications from master to slave can be made using Service Bus Topics. In this way we can have one or more slaves register to the same countries
  • Download – The download itself will be made directly from Azure Storage. The load of the slaves itself will be minimal

We could have a similar approach and eliminate the endpoints from slave. Each slave could have only the storage part. This is a good solution when you the number of request that need to be handled is not very high. But when you have hundreds of request per minutes, that a solution like this is more suitable. The slave endpoints can be hosted on small instances.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Run native .NET application in Docker (.NET Framework 4.6.2)

Scope
The main scope of this post is to see how we can run a legacy application written in .NET Framework in Docker.

Context
First of all, let’s define what is a legacy application in our context. By a legacy application we understand an application that runs .NET Framework 3.5 or higher in a production environment where we don’t have any more the people or documentation that would help us to understand what is happening behind the scene.
In this scenarios, you might want to migrate the current solution from a standard environment to Docker. There are many advantages for such a migration, like:

Continuous DeploymentTestingIsolationSecurity at container levelVersioning ControlEnvironment Standardization
Until now, we didn’t had the possibility to run a .NET application in Docker. With .NET Core, there was support for .NET Core in Docker, but migration from a full .NET framework to .NET Core can be costly and even impossible. Not only because of lack of features, but also because once you…