Skip to main content

Shared Access Signature and URL encoding on Windows Azure

Playing a little with Shared Access Signature was quite nice. In this moment this new functionality has a great potential. Playing a little with it I found an odd bug that I introduce from the code. From the start you need to know that this bug was generated by me and the cause of it was not Windows Azure.
Normally after we generate the access signature we are adding it to the URL that we want to access and we get a code similar to this:
var accessSignature = myTable.GetSharedAccessSignature(…);
string accessURL = tableAccessURL + … + accessSignature;
Uri accessUri = new Uri(accessURL);
string myAccessLink = accessUri.ToString();
The only problem here is that the accessSignature can contains specials characters like ‘=’ or ‘+’. This kind of characters needs to be encoded in the URL. Because of this from time to time we will get an URL that is not valid. In my case last time I got an access signature that contained this kind of specials characters for 4 times in a row. Because of this we cannot accept this kind of solutions.
A better way to get the string of an Uri object is to use AbsoluteUri for example. Or any other method that know to encode the URL characters. Using this method we will not need to worry about encoding problems. The code should look like this:
var accessSignature = myTable.GetSharedAccessSignature(…);
string accessURL = tableAccessURL + … + accessSignature;
Uri accessUri = new Uri(accessURL);
string myAccessLink = accessUri.AbsoluteUri();
Another solution for our problem is to use “EscapeUriString” method of the uri. This will do the same think for us.
In conclusion we should be carefully about how we convert any kind of Uri to a string and know very well what kind of characters can appear in it. If the URL that is generated doesn’t need to be read by a user I will also try to escape the uri string using any solutions that is available.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provi...