Skip to main content

Weak software design - Restrict user access in the web applications

Today I want to talk about a smell that I way sometimes on web application. We will start with a short story to create a context for our smell.
One day a request comes to the developer that he needs to create a page where the user can view a list of items. For each item the user can view details, edit an item and delete it. After a while the manager changes the request: “Only specific users can edit or delete items from the list”. Our developer based on the role of a user identifies what user can edit or delete items and for the rest of the user he decides to hide the two buttons.
When we look over the code something is wrong. If the user knows the URL for the edit page of an item or for deletion, he can edit and delete any items even if is not an admin.
We should never trust inputs that come from users. Every time we should validate on the server side the data from the user and also if he has rights to do execute a command or view a specific page.
In MVC application is very simple to do this. We only need to add an attribute to specific actions that we want to be access based on the user role. Another simple solution is to check if the user is part of a given role using the following method “Page.User.IsInRole(“RoleName”)”.
Be aware when you limit access of a user. For each access to a restricted area you should check the user rights. Don’t trust anything that the user sends to you.

Comments

  1. This is not a code smell, it's just plain weak software design.. :)
    Authorization for any real-world application should be designed upfront, not as an after-though, event if it's hard to get right.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This was not the first time when i saw this problem.
      I look over the internet and in some places is marked as code smell. I will update the title, thank you.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too