Skip to main content

How to disable the cache content of a web site that is hosted on Windows Azure.

One of my colleagues started to work on a web application that will be hosted on Windows Azure (HTML 5, JavaScript, MVC 4, .NET 4.5). The web application is a simple web application that displays the status of some web services and the load of some servers from a web farm.
The only problem that appear here is that the device from where the application will be accessed. The device has a custom web browser that use Mozilla core. After a will be observed that even if he change JavaScript files, the changes are not visible in the web application, even if he redeployed the application.
The problem is not from Windows Azure, the current configuration of the IIS is not set to cache any content. The problem is from the client browser. By default, Mozilla (Firefox) will try to cache any kind of content.
In the production environment this is the desired behavior, but in the development and testing stage this can be a nightmare and when you don’t have keyword “CTRL+F5” is not so easy to be used.
One solution to this problem is to change the cache configuration of the browser of the testing machines. This can be done very easily if you enter in the URL “about:config” and hit enter. A list of configuration parameters will be listed. The next two parameters need to be set to “false”:
network.http.use-cache = false
browser.cache.offline.enable = false
Another solution is to append to each file from the server that is required by the client a random string (a GUID or timestamp for example). In this way the file will be reloaded from the server each time. The only problem is that we don’t want this behavior in the production environment. A very nice solution for this is to add the session id to each CSS or JavaScript file that is requested from the server:
<script language="javascript" src="js/myFoo.js?id=${Session.SessionID}"></script>
Another solution is to set the expiration date of the content from the configuration file. The only thing that we need to do is to add in the configuration file the following node:
<configuration>
  <system.webServer>
    <staticContent>
      <clientCache cacheControlCustom="public"
      cacheControlMaxAge="00:30:00" cacheControlMode="UseMaxAge" />
    </staticContent>
   </system.webServer>
</configuration>
This configuration can be made also from ISS and from code. If you want to make this confirmation from code you need to add the following lines of code:
Response.Cache.SetExpires(DateTime.Now.AddHours(1));
Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.Public);
In the moment when you need to set this setting from the code, something is smelly. Maybe you need to use a static content delivery framework like “Mini Static Content Delivery” from CodePlex. Note, this feature is supported in MVC4.
There are a lot of solutions for this problems and a lot of frameworks. In this case the best thing to do was to disable the cache from the client device (for development purpose).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see