Skip to main content

Windows 2008 Server + Office 2007 = InteropServices.COMException (0x800A03EC): Microsoft Office Excel cannot access the file

Mi-am prins astazi urechile cu urmatoarea eroare:
InteropServices.COMException (0x800A03EC): Microsoft Office Excel cannot access the file
Aceasta eroare era ascunsa in spatele unei erori de tip NullReferenceException. Eroare aparea pe linia de cod car facea open la un excel.
myBooks.Open(fileName, 0, true, missing, missing, missing, true, missing, missing, missing, missing, missing, missing, missing. missing);
Ce era cel mai curios ca acest lucru se intampla doar in productie, pe un Windows Server 2008 pe 64b (x64). Aceasta problema nu aparea pe nici o masina de dezvoltare cu Windows 7, nici pe build machine sau pe masina de testare.
Am incercat sa i-au pe rand diferite cauze la aceasta problema. Am verificat daca nu cumva excel-ul este deja deschis de un alt proces. Fisierul nostru nu era deschis de nici un alt proces. Path-ul spre fisier era corect, nu era nici o problema de drepturi de acces pe fisierul dat.
Cautand o posibila cauza am gasit o cauza destul de ciudata, care in cazul meu se pare ca a rezolvat si problema. Pe sistemele WIndows 2008 Server, nu se ai creaza automat un folder de care are nevoie COM-ul de Office pentru a deschide un fisier.
Pentru Windows 2008 Server x86 este nevoie sa creati urmatorul folder:
C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile\Desktop
, iar pentru Windows 2008 Server x64:
C:\Windows\SysWOW64\config\systemprofile\Desktop
Nu intrebati de ce am avut nevoie de a procesa pe server fisiere Excel, stiu ca nu este recomandat, dar aceasta era o cerinta care ne-a venit.
Din cate am investigat pana acuma aceasta problema apare doar pe Windows 2008 in combinatie cu Office 2007. Pentru noi aceasta solutie ne-a rezolvat problema :-)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see