Skip to main content

Part 2 - Shared responsibility / The landing zone of a PCI-DSS compliant application inside Microsoft Azure

In the previous article, we talked about the core concepts of PCI-DSS and the impact of storing, processing and transmitting credit card data. 

This article focus on the shared responsibility concept and the importance of having all the parties at the same table. I promise that starting with the next article of this series, we will go on the technical side, but for now, we need to have a clear understanding of who the players are and what the responsibility level of each of them is.

The solution we plan to build is built around Microsoft Azure, Azure Kubernetes Services (AKS), Azure SQL and Azure CosmosDB. Considering these services, there are 3 main parties at the table:

  1. Microsoft Azure
  2. Kubernetes (AKS)
  3. The solution owner (the customer)
Depending on the solution, a shared responsibility exists between all of them, covering five main aspects:
Infrastructure, Access control, Network Security, Data protection, Malware detection. The combination of these five main aspects and the three parties define and shape what the shared responsibility model looks like. 

Microsoft Azure
The primary responsibility of Microsoft is to ensure that they provide all the PCI-DSS attestation of compliance, including the audit reports. They offer clear information related to who is responsible for what at each service level through a responsibility matrix that covers each PCI-DSS requirement. 
For compliances like PCI-DSS, HIPPA, SOC and many more, a specific set of services and functionality was built inside Microsoft Azure, giving us (the customer) the ability to build seamless systems that are  PCI-DSS compliant.
The compliance matrix is available here.
Kubernetes (AKS)
AKS is built on top of Kubernetes, which is an open-source system. The only thing that Microsoft is offering on top of it is the ability to spin, run, scale, and manage large Kubernetes clusters without the complexity of managing the cluster and the infrastructure that is behind the scene. 
It is not simple, but it makes life much more accessible and looks so effortless. 
The customer
The customer is the final owner of the solution and how decides to build the solution. He has a complete list of Microsoft Azure services and features that are PCI-DSS compliant. 
The customer needs to have a strong understanding of PCI-DSS to ensure that the right Azure services are used, and that all the processes are successfully implemented. 


The three parties are forced by the compliance requirements to build a system that is not time optimal from the cost point of view, technology and flow. Nevertheless, it ensures that credit card data are well protected once a user types his credit card data inside the system. Later on, in this series, we discuss why for small systems, you can end up paying for virtual security appliances more than for AKS cluster.

Microsoft Trust Center
Microsoft Trust Center is the entity inside Microsoft that ensures that compliance, privacy and security best practices are provided and regular audits and attests from QSA are done for all compliances, including PCI DSS. 
It should be the starting point of your journey if you want to build a compliant PCI-DSS system using Microsoft and Microsoft Azure technologies. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Database Modernization Matters for AI

  When companies transition to the cloud, they typically begin with applications and virtual machines, which is often the easier part of the process. The actual complexity arises later when databases are moved. To save time and effort, cloud adoption is more of a cloud migration in an IaaS manner, fulfilling current, but not future needs. Even organisations that are already in the cloud find that their databases, although “migrated,” are not genuinely modernised. This disparity becomes particularly evident when they begin to explore AI technologies. Understanding Modernisation Beyond Migration Database modernisation is distinct from merely relocating an outdated database to Azure. It's about making your data layer ready for future needs, like automation, real-time analytics, and AI capabilities. AI needs high throughput, which can be achieved using native DB cloud capabilities. When your database runs in a traditional setup (even hosted in the cloud), in that case, you will enc...

Cloud Myths: Migrating to the cloud is quick and easy (Pill 2 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

The idea that migration to the cloud is simple, straightforward and rapid is a wrong assumption. It’s a common misconception of business stakeholders that generates delays, budget overruns and technical dept. A migration requires laborious planning, technical expertise and a rigorous process.  Migrations, especially cloud migrations, are not one-size-fits-all journeys. One of the most critical steps is under evaluation, under budget and under consideration. The evaluation phase, where existing infrastructure, applications, database, network and the end-to-end estate are evaluated and mapped to a cloud strategy, is crucial to ensure the success of cloud migration. Additional factors such as security, compliance, and system dependencies increase the complexity of cloud migration.  A misconception regarding lift-and-shits is that they are fast and cheap. Moving applications to the cloud without changes does not provide the capability to optimise costs and performance, leading to ...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...