Skip to main content

Azure Private Link advantages over Azure Service Endpoint

People often ask what they should use to secure the connection between Azure PaaS services and VNETs. Today's article talks about the key differences between Azure Private Link and Azure Service Endpoints and when you should use each of them.

What is?

Azure Service Endpoint provides a direct and secure connection to Azure PaaS services over the Azure backbone network. Even if the traffic leaves your VNET and hits the public endpoint of the Azure PaaS service, it goes over the Azure backbone.

Azure Private Link enables you to have a private IP inside your VNET used to hit the endpoint of your Azure PaaS service. The assigned private IP is part of your VNET and ensures that all traffic will stay within your VNET.

What about Azure Private Endpoint? It is part of Azure Private Link, enabling you to configure the private IP address and the peering over VPN or VNET. 

If you want to expose your own service over  Private Link, you can do this by using Azure Private Link Service, but you need a Standard Load Balancer (ILB/PLB) to create the Private Link. It's an excellent service if you want to share your service with other consumers in secure manure. 

Sometimes Azure resources have support only for Private Link or Service Endpoint, not for both. You should not design a solution that uses only one of them.


Concerns

The section covers the most important infrastructure and security concerns that we should consider when we decide what approach we would like to use.

Connectivity

Private Link - Azure PaaS service receives a private IP from your networks used for communication with your VNET

Service Endpoint - Azure PaaS public IP it is still used, the trafic between VNET and the public IP of Azure PaaS service goes over Azure backbokne network

OnPrem Connectivity

Private Link - ExpressRoute and VPN tunnels provide support to extend the private Azure PaaS connectivity to the OnPrem networks

Service Endpoint - No native support for OnPrem integrations. Build mainly for Azure VNETs.  

Cost

Private Link - The cost is based on inboud, outbound traffic and no. of endpoints. Depending on the total traffic, the total cost can grow easilty

Service Endpoint - No additional cost (free of use)

Data protection

Private Link - Build-in data protection

Service Endpoint - Needs to be integrated with a Network Virtual Appliance/Firewall of exfiltration protection is required

Availability

Private Link - The no. of Azure PaaS services supported by Private Link is high and is grow each month - full list of Azure PaaS Services available here.

Service Endpoint - Well supported by core Azure PaaS Services - full list of Azure PaaS Services available here.

UDRs and NSGs 

Private Link - The traffic can bypass the Private Endpoint of you use UDRs and NSGs. Special configuration might be required

Service Endpoint - No specific overlaps exists

Complexity

Private Link - Involves updates to DNS (Azure Private DNS) and where the service will attach to your VNET.

Service Endpoint - Easy to configure and setup from Azure Portal

Cross-region support

Private Link - Has full support for access resources across regions and across Azure AD tenants

Service Endpoint - No native support for cross-region support


Conclusion

When security and data restrictions are your main concerns, Azure Private Link should be your first choice. It is superior compared to Azure Service Endpoint, even if the setup complexity is higher. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too