Skip to main content

Azure Private Link advantages over Azure Service Endpoint

People often ask what they should use to secure the connection between Azure PaaS services and VNETs. Today's article talks about the key differences between Azure Private Link and Azure Service Endpoints and when you should use each of them.

What is?

Azure Service Endpoint provides a direct and secure connection to Azure PaaS services over the Azure backbone network. Even if the traffic leaves your VNET and hits the public endpoint of the Azure PaaS service, it goes over the Azure backbone.

Azure Private Link enables you to have a private IP inside your VNET used to hit the endpoint of your Azure PaaS service. The assigned private IP is part of your VNET and ensures that all traffic will stay within your VNET.

What about Azure Private Endpoint? It is part of Azure Private Link, enabling you to configure the private IP address and the peering over VPN or VNET. 

If you want to expose your own service over  Private Link, you can do this by using Azure Private Link Service, but you need a Standard Load Balancer (ILB/PLB) to create the Private Link. It's an excellent service if you want to share your service with other consumers in secure manure. 

Sometimes Azure resources have support only for Private Link or Service Endpoint, not for both. You should not design a solution that uses only one of them.


Concerns

The section covers the most important infrastructure and security concerns that we should consider when we decide what approach we would like to use.

Connectivity

Private Link - Azure PaaS service receives a private IP from your networks used for communication with your VNET

Service Endpoint - Azure PaaS public IP it is still used, the trafic between VNET and the public IP of Azure PaaS service goes over Azure backbokne network

OnPrem Connectivity

Private Link - ExpressRoute and VPN tunnels provide support to extend the private Azure PaaS connectivity to the OnPrem networks

Service Endpoint - No native support for OnPrem integrations. Build mainly for Azure VNETs.  

Cost

Private Link - The cost is based on inboud, outbound traffic and no. of endpoints. Depending on the total traffic, the total cost can grow easilty

Service Endpoint - No additional cost (free of use)

Data protection

Private Link - Build-in data protection

Service Endpoint - Needs to be integrated with a Network Virtual Appliance/Firewall of exfiltration protection is required

Availability

Private Link - The no. of Azure PaaS services supported by Private Link is high and is grow each month - full list of Azure PaaS Services available here.

Service Endpoint - Well supported by core Azure PaaS Services - full list of Azure PaaS Services available here.

UDRs and NSGs 

Private Link - The traffic can bypass the Private Endpoint of you use UDRs and NSGs. Special configuration might be required

Service Endpoint - No specific overlaps exists

Complexity

Private Link - Involves updates to DNS (Azure Private DNS) and where the service will attach to your VNET.

Service Endpoint - Easy to configure and setup from Azure Portal

Cross-region support

Private Link - Has full support for access resources across regions and across Azure AD tenants

Service Endpoint - No native support for cross-region support


Conclusion

When security and data restrictions are your main concerns, Azure Private Link should be your first choice. It is superior compared to Azure Service Endpoint, even if the setup complexity is higher. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...